diff for duplicates of <20181217115931.GA6853@lst.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 9411a44..d1e89f0 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:14:29AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: +On Sat, Dec 15, 2018@12:14:29AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > Yep, that is right. Certainly the MMU case is broken. Some noMMU cases work > by virtue of the SoC only having an instruction cache (the older V2 cores). diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 8496840..42a41d3 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,28 +3,13 @@ "ref\0CAMuHMdWOr0EsgFQF8tjJYLxKVXx+Jwn73N8SVKt8AQGLKQ8V-A@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\020181214114719.GA3316@lst.de\0" "ref\05ae55118-6858-9121-6b3e-9b19b41550ef@westnet.com.au\0" - "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: zero memory returned from dma_alloc_*\0" + "From\0hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: zero memory returned from dma_alloc_*\0" "Date\0Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:59:31 +0100\0" - "To\0Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au>\0" - "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>" - Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org> - Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> - ashutosh.dixit@intel.com - alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org> - arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org> - linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org - linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org> - Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org> - Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org> - linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org> - sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org> - linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org - " Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0" + "To\0linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:14:29AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:\n" + "On Sat, Dec 15, 2018@12:14:29AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:\n" "> Yep, that is right. Certainly the MMU case is broken. Some noMMU cases work\n" "> by virtue of the SoC only having an instruction cache (the older V2 cores).\n" "\n" @@ -58,4 +43,4 @@ "as I can tell FEC only uses DMA coherent allocations for the TSO\n" headers anyway, is TSO even used on this SOC? -8e941199970c7cf8bfa269069307f1a02489e89323017c3f2ec2ac1d80951ba2 +ce298588096c017fcc8defe91a450a0d35582e8480aadd723ec93c34f784ed53
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 8496840..7812514 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -4,24 +4,9 @@ "ref\020181214114719.GA3316@lst.de\0" "ref\05ae55118-6858-9121-6b3e-9b19b41550ef@westnet.com.au\0" "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: zero memory returned from dma_alloc_*\0" + "Subject\0[OpenRISC] [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: zero memory returned from dma_alloc_*\0" "Date\0Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:59:31 +0100\0" - "To\0Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au>\0" - "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>" - Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org> - Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> - ashutosh.dixit@intel.com - alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org> - arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org> - linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org - linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org> - Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org> - Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org> - linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org> - sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org> - linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org - " Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0" + "To\0openrisc@lists.librecores.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:14:29AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:\n" @@ -58,4 +43,4 @@ "as I can tell FEC only uses DMA coherent allocations for the TSO\n" headers anyway, is TSO even used on this SOC? -8e941199970c7cf8bfa269069307f1a02489e89323017c3f2ec2ac1d80951ba2 +dc44398d38f5a737ba63a979a5ec7d8a76a83a9da3187b863ac7db032f3d273e
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index 8496840..ebfbe79 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ "ref\05ae55118-6858-9121-6b3e-9b19b41550ef@westnet.com.au\0" "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: zero memory returned from dma_alloc_*\0" - "Date\0Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:59:31 +0100\0" + "Date\0Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:59:31 +0000\0" "To\0Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au>\0" "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>" Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> @@ -58,4 +58,4 @@ "as I can tell FEC only uses DMA coherent allocations for the TSO\n" headers anyway, is TSO even used on this SOC? -8e941199970c7cf8bfa269069307f1a02489e89323017c3f2ec2ac1d80951ba2 +cc329f10b02fc9bda3bb6e47d22592aa58d4caa56b79e8e127c68eb3e29ef5f7
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.