From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Cc: magnus.karlsson@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@gmail.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
u9012063@gmail.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com,
jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, andrew@lunn.ch, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Add support for XDP_ATTACH
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:50:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181217135035.0d75aa32@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181217102501.22019-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:24:54 +0100
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
> XDP_ATTACH associates an XDP socket to a specific netdev Rx queue. To
> redirect a packet to an attached socket from XDP, the bpf_xsk_redirect
> helper is used. The bpf_xsk_redirect helper is also introduced in this
> series.
>
> Many XDP socket users just need a simple way of creating/binding a
> socket and receiving frames right away without a complicated XDP
> program. "Attached" XDP sockets removes the need for the XSKMAP, and
> allows for a trivial XDP program, e.g.:
>
> SEC("xdp")
> int xdp_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx)
> {
> return bpf_xsk_redirect(ctx);
> }
>
> An attached XDP socket also has better performance than the XSKMAP
> based sockets (performance numbers below).
I still have a general problem with this approach.
The AF_XDP socket is build around (and gets its performance) from
being tied to a specific RX-queue. That design begs to have an XDP
program per RX-queue.
Patchset-v1 moved towards this goal. But in this patchset-v2 you
steer away from this again, and work-around the issue with the current
limitations of 1-XDP program per netdev. (Which result in; if a
single AF_XDP socket is used in the system, which can ONLY be for a
single RX-queue by design, then ALL other XDP_PASS traffic also have
to take the overhead of indirect BPF call).
IMHO with this use-case, now is the time to introduce XDP programs per
RX-queue. Yes, it will be more work, but I will offer to helpout.
This should be generalized as XDP programs per RX-queue can be used by
other use-cases too:
In general terms: We can setup a NIC hardware filter to deliver
frame matching some criteria, then we can avoid rechecking these
criterias in on the (RX) CPU when/if we can attach an XDP prog to this
specific RX-queue directly. This *IS* exactly what AF_XDP does, but it
is in general useful for others, like CPUMAP redirect.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-17 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-17 10:24 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Add support for XDP_ATTACH Björn Töpel
2018-12-17 10:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/7] xsk: simplify AF_XDP socket teardown Björn Töpel
2018-12-17 10:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] xsk: add XDP_ATTACH bind() flag Björn Töpel
2018-12-17 10:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] bpf: add bpf_xsk_redirect function Björn Töpel
2018-12-17 10:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] tools/bpf: sync kernel uapi bpf.h to tools directory Björn Töpel
2018-12-17 10:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/7] libbpf: initial support for builtin BPF programs Björn Töpel
2018-12-17 10:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/7] samples: bpf: simplify/cleanup xdpsock Björn Töpel
2018-12-17 10:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] samples: bpf: add support for XDP_ATTACH to xdpsock Björn Töpel
2018-12-17 12:50 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2018-12-17 13:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Add support for XDP_ATTACH Björn Töpel
2018-12-17 14:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-12-17 14:55 ` Magnus Karlsson
2018-12-17 15:30 ` Björn Töpel
2018-12-18 23:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-12-19 9:34 ` Björn Töpel
2018-12-19 16:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-12-20 0:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-12-18 2:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-18 8:59 ` Björn Töpel
2018-12-18 18:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181217135035.0d75aa32@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=u9012063@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.