All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 2/5] RDMA/core: Don't depend device ODP capabilities on kconfig option
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 17:33:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181220173306.GI29267@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181220172956.GC3940@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 07:29:56PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 05:20:51PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:23:15AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
> > >
> > > Device capability bits are exposing what specific device supports from
> > > HW perspective. Those bits are not dependent on kernel configurations
> > > and RDMA/core should ensure that proper interfaces to users will be
> > > disabled if CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING is not set.
> > >
> > > Fixes: f4056bfd8ccf ("IB/core: Add on demand paging caps to ib_uverbs_ex_query_device")
> > > Fixes: 8cdd312cfed7 ("IB/mlx5: Implement the ODP capability query verb")
> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
> > >  drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 2 --
> > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c    | 2 --
> > >  2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > > index 6b12cc5f97b2..549d9eedf62e 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > > @@ -3609,7 +3609,6 @@ static int ib_uverbs_ex_query_device(struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs)
> > >
> > >  	copy_query_dev_fields(ucontext, &resp.base, &attr);
> > >
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING
> > >  	resp.odp_caps.general_caps = attr.odp_caps.general_caps;
> > >  	resp.odp_caps.per_transport_caps.rc_odp_caps =
> > >  		attr.odp_caps.per_transport_caps.rc_odp_caps;
> > > @@ -3617,7 +3616,6 @@ static int ib_uverbs_ex_query_device(struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs)
> > >  		attr.odp_caps.per_transport_caps.uc_odp_caps;
> > >  	resp.odp_caps.per_transport_caps.ud_odp_caps =
> > >  		attr.odp_caps.per_transport_caps.ud_odp_caps;
> > > -#endif
> >
> > This one is maybe OK, assuming the driver fills in 0..
> >
> > >  	resp.timestamp_mask = attr.timestamp_mask;
> > >  	resp.hca_core_clock = attr.hca_core_clock;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
> > > index 6584e638387a..d7e5ba5034aa 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
> > > @@ -923,11 +923,9 @@ static int mlx5_ib_query_device(struct ib_device *ibdev,
> > >  	props->hca_core_clock = MLX5_CAP_GEN(mdev, device_frequency_khz);
> > >  	props->timestamp_mask = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL;
> > >
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING
> > >  	if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(mdev, pg))
> > >  		props->device_cap_flags |= IB_DEVICE_ON_DEMAND_PAGING;
> > >  	props->odp_caps = dev->odp_caps;
> > > -#endif
> >
> > But shouldn't this be protected? If the driver has compiled out ODP it
> > shouldn't set the cap flag...
> 
> I see those capabilities as device properties and not as kernel ones.
> 
> Current situation looks bad for me, when I have same device which
> reports differently information depends on some compilation flag.

It is not device capabilities, it is a kernel API capability if the
API is not available the bit should not be set.

The field is badly named.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-20 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-20  9:23 [PATCH rdma-next 0/5] Cleanup of CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING usage Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH rdma-next 1/5] RDMA: Clean structures from CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH rdma-next 2/5] RDMA/core: Don't depend device ODP capabilities on kconfig option Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20 17:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-20 17:29     ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20 17:33       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2018-12-20 17:50         ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20 23:22           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH rdma-next 3/5] RDMA/mlx5: Introduce and reuse helper to identify ODP MR Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH rdma-next 4/5] RDMA/mlx5: Embed into the code flow the ODP config option Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 5/5] RDMA/mlx5: Delete declaration of already removed function Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-21  3:32 ` [PATCH rdma-next 0/5] Cleanup of CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING usage Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-21 13:59   ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-21 16:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-22  9:18       ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181220173306.GI29267@mellanox.com \
    --to=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=haggaie@mellanox.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.