From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:46:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] perf trace: use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling, "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP_*" Message-Id: <20181221124611.GA4210@kernel.org> List-Id: References: <20181221084809.6108-1-colin.king@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <20181221084809.6108-1-colin.king@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Colin King Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:48:09AM +0000, Colin King escreveu: > From: Colin Ian King > > The spelling of the SECCOMP is incorrect, fix these. Thanks, applied. - Arnaldo > Fixes: c65c83ffe904 ("perf trace: Allow asking for not suppressing common string prefixes") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > --- > tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c > index 4600c28a3cfe..637722e2796b 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c > +++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_op(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscall_arg *arg) > { > bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix; > - const char *prefix = "SECOMP_SET_MODE_"; > + const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_SET_MODE_"; > int op = arg->val; > size_t printed = 0; > > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_flags(char *bf, size_t size, > struct syscall_arg *arg) > { > bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix; > - const char *prefix = "SECOMP_FILTER_FLAG_"; > + const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_"; > int printed = 0, flags = arg->val; > > #define P_FLAG(n) \ > -- > 2.19.1 -- - Arnaldo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49B8C43387 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7252190C for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:46:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1545396378; bh=APe+L7skTQcDmKppYb0jhRqW68QpmYd83miFL3Jx3wo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=h3CmMZjxrpVjCLK05vz+Ibcxv0B/oPVEC6ShzRYj7xtfEsAdWIukpUpCX/BrRiDyg TeY5aPv2vvtPl8VWOv8722yIDXZ7+MyKnfflohqQfv5EitQy3wjvbMtKqM3FWvlN52 7M2fJBYGEQW26vMHlvXu5pM1zhLOOOhkMT8EuFNU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390438AbeLUMqQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2018 07:46:16 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48296 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390384AbeLUMqP (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2018 07:46:15 -0500 Received: from quaco.ghostprotocols.net (unknown [190.15.121.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A64D92190C; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:46:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1545396374; bh=APe+L7skTQcDmKppYb0jhRqW68QpmYd83miFL3Jx3wo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=opG31RPEukuA/kUmq0JbafLywJqgB2EYYfaTRjbm4JVKdPwYS2MFy7zzPPnY7denI NvP2JN7HoZN6wE1+LY4j3HsyWaY538Q107otfqKGcuTnVfVWRgRImrQPBx3+KO5w7O jUy2YuRAR69WoSPhd/HhMM5jVvTaCGQR529v86WE= Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 331BF403A8; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:46:11 -0300 (-03) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:46:11 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Colin King Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] perf trace: use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling, "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP_*" Message-ID: <20181221124611.GA4210@kernel.org> References: <20181221084809.6108-1-colin.king@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181221084809.6108-1-colin.king@canonical.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:48:09AM +0000, Colin King escreveu: > From: Colin Ian King > > The spelling of the SECCOMP is incorrect, fix these. Thanks, applied. - Arnaldo > Fixes: c65c83ffe904 ("perf trace: Allow asking for not suppressing common string prefixes") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > --- > tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c > index 4600c28a3cfe..637722e2796b 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c > +++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_op(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscall_arg *arg) > { > bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix; > - const char *prefix = "SECOMP_SET_MODE_"; > + const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_SET_MODE_"; > int op = arg->val; > size_t printed = 0; > > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_flags(char *bf, size_t size, > struct syscall_arg *arg) > { > bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix; > - const char *prefix = "SECOMP_FILTER_FLAG_"; > + const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_"; > int printed = 0, flags = arg->val; > > #define P_FLAG(n) \ > -- > 2.19.1 -- - Arnaldo