[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 05/14] cmd: efishell: add devices command

[AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>]

On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 04:11:14AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03.12.18 08:02, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 12:46:20AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05.11.18 10:06, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>> "devices" command prints all the uefi variables on the system.
> >>> => efishell devices
> >>> Device Name
> >>> ============================================
> >>> /VenHw(e61d73b9-a384-4acc-aeab-82e828f3628b)
> >>> /VenHw(e61d73b9-a384-4acc-aeab-82e828f3628b)/SD(0)/SD(0)
> >>> /VenHw(e61d73b9-a384-4acc-aeab-82e828f3628b)/SD(0)/SD(0)/\
> >>> 				HD(2,MBR,0x086246ba,0x40800,0x3f800)
> >>> /VenHw(e61d73b9-a384-4acc-aeab-82e828f3628b)/SD(0)/SD(0)/\
> >>> 				HD(1,MBR,0x086246ba,0x800,0x40000)
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>  cmd/efishell.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/cmd/efishell.c b/cmd/efishell.c
> >>> index abc8216c7bd6..f4fa3fdf28a7 100644
> >>> --- a/cmd/efishell.c
> >>> +++ b/cmd/efishell.c
> >>> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> >>>  
> >>>  DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> >>>  
> >>> +static const struct efi_boot_services *bs;
> >>
> >> Why do you need a local copy of this?
> > 
> > Good point. It's because I followed the way boot manager does :)
> > 
> > I think that it would be good to do so since either boot manager or
> > efishell should ultimately be an independent efi application
> > in its nature.
> > 
> > What do you think?

Back to your original comment: Why do you need a local copy of this?

Do you think we should use systab.boottime,runtime instead?

> As mentioned in the other email thread, I think that we should
> definitely evaluate to add the edk2 shell as built-in option.

Do you expect that I will add a new config, say, CONFIG_EFI_SHELL_PATH? 

-Takahiro Akashi

> That way for the "full-fledged" shell experience, your built-in code is
> not needed. But I still believe it would be useful for quick and
> built-in debugging.
> 
> 
> Alex