From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: remove superfluous writeback mapping eof trimming
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:30:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190111123032.31538-5-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190111123032.31538-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
Now that the cached writeback mapping is explicitly invalidated on
data fork changes, the EOF trimming band-aid is no longer necessary.
Remove xfs_trim_extent_eof() as well since it has no other users.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 11 -----------
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h | 1 -
fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 15 ---------------
3 files changed, 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 332eefa2700b..4c73927819c2 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -3685,17 +3685,6 @@ xfs_trim_extent(
}
}
-/* trim extent to within eof */
-void
-xfs_trim_extent_eof(
- struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec,
- struct xfs_inode *ip)
-
-{
- xfs_trim_extent(irec, 0, XFS_B_TO_FSB(ip->i_mount,
- i_size_read(VFS_I(ip))));
-}
-
/*
* Trim the returned map to the required bounds
*/
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
index 09d3ea97cc15..b4ff710d7250 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
@@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ static inline bool xfs_bmap_is_real_extent(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec)
void xfs_trim_extent(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec, xfs_fileoff_t bno,
xfs_filblks_t len);
-void xfs_trim_extent_eof(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *, struct xfs_inode *);
int xfs_bmap_add_attrfork(struct xfs_inode *ip, int size, int rsvd);
int xfs_bmap_set_attrforkoff(struct xfs_inode *ip, int size, int *version);
void xfs_bmap_local_to_extents_empty(struct xfs_inode *ip, int whichfork);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 33a1be5df99f..8cc0c31d18b6 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -319,19 +319,6 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
bool imap_valid;
int error = 0;
- /*
- * We have to make sure the cached mapping is within EOF to protect
- * against eofblocks trimming on file release leaving us with a stale
- * mapping. Otherwise, a page for a subsequent file extending buffered
- * write could get picked up by this writeback cycle and written to the
- * wrong blocks.
- *
- * Note that what we really want here is a generic mapping invalidation
- * mechanism to protect us from arbitrary extent modifying contexts, not
- * just eofblocks.
- */
- xfs_trim_extent_eof(&wpc->imap, ip);
-
/*
* COW fork blocks can overlap data fork blocks even if the blocks
* aren't shared. COW I/O always takes precedent, so we must always
@@ -452,7 +439,6 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
}
wpc->imap = imap;
- xfs_trim_extent_eof(&wpc->imap, ip);
trace_xfs_map_blocks_found(ip, offset, count, wpc->io_type, &imap);
return 0;
allocate_blocks:
@@ -464,7 +450,6 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
ASSERT(whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK || cow_fsb == NULLFILEOFF ||
imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount <= cow_fsb);
wpc->imap = imap;
- xfs_trim_extent_eof(&wpc->imap, ip);
trace_xfs_map_blocks_alloc(ip, offset, count, wpc->io_type, &imap);
return 0;
}
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-11 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-11 12:30 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: properly invalidate cached writeback mapping Brian Foster
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: eof trim writeback mapping as soon as it is cached Brian Foster
2019-01-16 13:35 ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-16 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: update fork seq counter on data fork changes Brian Foster
2019-01-17 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: validate writeback mapping using data fork seq counter Brian Foster
2019-01-13 21:49 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-14 15:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-14 20:57 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-15 11:26 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-17 16:35 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-17 17:53 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-11 12:30 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-01-11 13:31 ` [PATCH] tests/generic: test writepage cached mapping validity Brian Foster
2019-01-14 9:30 ` Eryu Guan
2019-01-14 15:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-15 3:52 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190111123032.31538-5-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.