From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: return exit code 4 for skipped tests
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:11:55 +0300
Message-ID: <20190114201155.GA9978@avx2>
References: <20190108193108.GA12259@avx2>
 <87zhsahm1s.fsf@morokweng.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87zhsahm1s.fsf@morokweng.localdomain>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 07:33:19PM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> writes:
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-loadavg-001.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-loadavg-001.c
> > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int main(void)
> >
> >  	if (unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) == -1) {
> >  		if (errno == ENOSYS || errno == EPERM)
> > -			return 2;
> > +			return 4;
> >  		return 1;
> >  	}
> 
> Can't these tests use the KSFT_SKIP macro defined in kselftest.h?

They can! I tried to find a single use of XPASS and XFAIL and failed and
now I just don't want to have anything to do with that header.