From: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>
To: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>, "Серафим Долбилов" <s.dlblv@ya.ru>
Cc: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [HELP] Barebox porting
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 21:48:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190116214837.d890dc8ca97f5de171a79408@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190116172806.GB31124@ravnborg.org>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 18:28:06 +0100
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
Hi!
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:14:03PM +0300, Серафим Долбилов wrote:
> >
> > A new portion of questions is ready:)
> > 1. dlmalloc or tlsf - what are pros and cons of each of them?
>
> Looking at the history I could see that dlmalloc was present since barebox
> was forked from U-boot. So and old implmentation.
>
> Later tlsf was added, wihtout any explanation why.
> But based on the fact that Jean (who added tlsf) did is when we already
> had dlmalloc I tentatively conclude that tlsf is the better alternative.
> And I can see line of code is less than dlmalloc too - so maybe it is even smaller.
> I would go for tlsf based on the above and not botheting about this anymore.
Please see this Sascha's comment on tlsf:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2011-December/005288.html
At the moment we use tlsf2 in barebox. Please note that there is more recent tlsf3 at github:
https://github.com/mattconte/tlsf
--
Best regards,
Antony Pavlov
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-16 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <44943261547037040@iva5-750e13568e4d.qloud-c.yandex.net>
2019-01-09 12:40 ` [HELP] Barebox porting Серафим Долбилов
2019-01-09 13:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-16 15:14 ` Серафим Долбилов
2019-01-16 15:37 ` Серафим Долбилов
2019-01-16 17:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-01-16 17:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-01-16 18:48 ` Antony Pavlov [this message]
2019-01-16 15:59 ` Серафим Долбилов
2019-01-17 7:59 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-17 12:44 ` Серафим Долбилов
2019-01-17 13:28 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-17 13:43 ` Roland Hieber
2019-01-17 14:48 ` Серафим Долбилов
2019-01-17 16:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-01-17 21:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-18 15:01 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-18 15:14 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-18 16:30 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-21 12:34 Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-21 14:28 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-21 15:12 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-21 15:35 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-21 16:35 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-01-21 16:43 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-22 6:33 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-22 14:07 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-22 14:42 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-22 16:12 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-23 9:11 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-23 10:01 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-23 10:17 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-25 12:18 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-25 14:11 ` Seraphim Dolbilov
2019-01-28 8:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-28 8:44 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190116214837.d890dc8ca97f5de171a79408@gmail.com \
--to=antonynpavlov@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.dlblv@ya.ru \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.