From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Ching Huang <ching2048@areca.com.tw>
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, colin.king@canonical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: arcmsr: Fix suspend/resume of ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_B part 2
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:59:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190117070227.GM4504@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1547696703.4339.21.camel@Centos6.3-64>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:45:03AM +0800, Ching Huang wrote:
> >From Ching Huang <ching2048@areca.com.tw>
>
> Fix suspend/resume of ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_B part 2.
>
What does this look like from a user perspective? Does it fail every
time or does it only fail sometimes?
What's the bug exactly?
There is no Fixes tag...
> Signed-off-by: Ching Huang <ching2048@areca.com.tw>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h
> index a94c513..b98c632 100755
> --- a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h
> @@ -508,9 +508,9 @@ struct MessageUnit_A
> struct MessageUnit_B
> {
> uint32_t post_qbuffer[ARCMSR_MAX_HBB_POSTQUEUE];
> - uint32_t done_qbuffer[ARCMSR_MAX_HBB_POSTQUEUE];
> + volatile uint32_t done_qbuffer[ARCMSR_MAX_HBB_POSTQUEUE];
There is a well known rule of thumb that when someone uses "volatile"
in the kernel it means there is a locking problem... Is this __iomem or
something?
> uint32_t postq_index;
> - uint32_t doneq_index;
> + volatile uint32_t doneq_index;
> uint32_t __iomem *drv2iop_doorbell;
> uint32_t __iomem *drv2iop_doorbell_mask;
> uint32_t __iomem *iop2drv_doorbell;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c
> index 5736434..88053b1 100755
> --- a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c
> @@ -1113,7 +1113,11 @@ static int arcmsr_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> switch (acb->adapter_type) {
> case ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_B: {
> struct MessageUnit_B *reg = acb->pmuB;
> - reg->post_qbuffer[0] = 0;
> + uint32_t i;
> + for (i = 0; i < ARCMSR_MAX_HBB_POSTQUEUE; i++) {
> + reg->post_qbuffer[i] = 0;
> + reg->done_qbuffer[i] = 0;
> + }
Is this cause by patch 1 changing the zalloc to regular alloc?? If so
then it should be folded into that patch instead of sent separately.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-17 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-17 3:45 [PATCH 2/3] scsi: arcmsr: Fix suspend/resume of ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_B part 2 Ching Huang
2019-01-17 3:45 ` Ching Huang
2019-01-17 7:59 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2019-01-17 8:47 ` Ching Huang
2019-01-17 8:47 ` Ching Huang
2019-01-17 9:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-17 9:52 ` Ching Huang
2019-01-22 7:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-22 0:03 ` Ching Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190117070227.GM4504@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=ching2048@areca.com.tw \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.