From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: "Brüns, Stefan" <Stefan.Bruens@rwth-aachen.de>,
"jdelvare@suse.com" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] hwmon: (ina2xx) Improve current and power reading precision
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:16:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190117231622.GA9310@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190117231323.GB23511@roeck-us.net>
Hi Guenter,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 03:13:23PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I have one claim stating that your change won't make a difference,
> and your claim that it would. That leaves me with no choice but to
> spend a large amount of time with the datasheet, and possibly with
> my evaluation boards, trying to find out who is correct. Unfortunately,
> time is scarce to come by those days. I would very much prefer for
> you folks to sort out your differences and present me with a single
> opinion.
>
> Long term the best solution would really be to replace the hwmon
> driver with the iio driver and use the iio-hwmon bridge. The ina2xx
> driver doesn't support limits, so there is no real benefit of using
> the hwmon driver over the iio driver, at least assuming that the
> iio driver supports all the attributes. So maybe you should make your
> case for the changes in the iio driver.
Thanks for the input. Let's drop this hwmon change then.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-17 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-21 1:26 [RFC][PATCH] hwmon: (ina2xx) Improve current and power reading precision Nicolin Chen
2018-11-21 16:13 ` Brüns, Stefan
2018-11-21 19:40 ` Nicolin Chen
2018-11-21 19:40 ` Nicolin Chen
2018-11-21 22:16 ` Brüns, Stefan
2018-11-21 22:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-01-05 1:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2019-01-05 1:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2019-01-17 22:38 ` Nicolin Chen
2019-01-17 23:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-01-17 23:16 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190117231622.GA9310@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com \
--to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=Stefan.Bruens@rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.