From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, philmd@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com, rth@twiddle.net,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, cohuck@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 6/7] target/ppc: Refactor kvm_handle_debug
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 12:07:57 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190118140758.829-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190118140758.829-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
There are four scenarios being handled in this function:
- single stepping
- hardware breakpoints
- software breakpoints
- fallback (no debug supported)
A future patch will add code to handle specific single step and
software breakpoints cases so let's split each scenario into its own
function now to avoid hurting readability.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
target/ppc/kvm.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
index 96a5895792..c27190d7fb 100644
--- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
+++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
@@ -1621,52 +1621,66 @@ static int kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(CPUState *cs,
return handle;
}
+static int kvm_handle_singlestep(void)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static int kvm_handle_sw_breakpoint(void)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
static int kvm_handle_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
{
CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
struct kvm_debug_exit_arch *arch_info = &run->debug.arch;
- int handle = 0;
if (cs->singlestep_enabled) {
- handle = 1;
- } else if (arch_info->status) {
- handle = kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info);
- } else if (kvm_find_sw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info->address)) {
- handle = 1;
- } else {
- /* QEMU is not able to handle debug exception, so inject
- * program exception to guest;
- * Yes program exception NOT debug exception !!
- * When QEMU is using debug resources then debug exception must
- * be always set. To achieve this we set MSR_DE and also set
- * MSRP_DEP so guest cannot change MSR_DE.
- * When emulating debug resource for guest we want guest
- * to control MSR_DE (enable/disable debug interrupt on need).
- * Supporting both configurations are NOT possible.
- * So the result is that we cannot share debug resources
- * between QEMU and Guest on BOOKE architecture.
- * In the current design QEMU gets the priority over guest,
- * this means that if QEMU is using debug resources then guest
- * cannot use them;
- * For software breakpoint QEMU uses a privileged instruction;
- * So there cannot be any reason that we are here for guest
- * set debug exception, only possibility is guest executed a
- * privileged / illegal instruction and that's why we are
- * injecting a program interrupt.
- */
+ return kvm_handle_singlestep();
+ }
+
+ if (arch_info->status) {
+ return kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info);
+ }
- cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
- /* env->nip is PC, so increment this by 4 to use
- * ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(), which set srr0 = env->nip - 4.
- */
- env->nip += 4;
- cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM;
- env->error_code = POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL;
- ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
+ if (kvm_find_sw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info->address)) {
+ return kvm_handle_sw_breakpoint();
}
- return handle;
+ /*
+ * QEMU is not able to handle debug exception, so inject
+ * program exception to guest;
+ * Yes program exception NOT debug exception !!
+ * When QEMU is using debug resources then debug exception must
+ * be always set. To achieve this we set MSR_DE and also set
+ * MSRP_DEP so guest cannot change MSR_DE.
+ * When emulating debug resource for guest we want guest
+ * to control MSR_DE (enable/disable debug interrupt on need).
+ * Supporting both configurations are NOT possible.
+ * So the result is that we cannot share debug resources
+ * between QEMU and Guest on BOOKE architecture.
+ * In the current design QEMU gets the priority over guest,
+ * this means that if QEMU is using debug resources then guest
+ * cannot use them;
+ * For software breakpoint QEMU uses a privileged instruction;
+ * So there cannot be any reason that we are here for guest
+ * set debug exception, only possibility is guest executed a
+ * privileged / illegal instruction and that's why we are
+ * injecting a program interrupt.
+ */
+ cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
+ /*
+ * env->nip is PC, so increment this by 4 to use
+ * ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(), which set srr0 = env->nip - 4.
+ */
+ env->nip += 4;
+ cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM;
+ env->error_code = POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL;
+ ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
+
+ return 0;
}
int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-18 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 14:07 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 0/7] target/ppc: single step for KVM HV Fabiano Rosas
2019-01-18 14:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 1/7] target/ppc: Move exception vector offset computation into a function Fabiano Rosas
2019-01-25 1:22 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-01-18 14:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 2/7] target/ppc: Add ppc_get_trace_int_handler_addr Fabiano Rosas
2019-01-25 1:22 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-02-01 4:08 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-01-18 14:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 3/7] kvm: support checking for single step capability Fabiano Rosas
2019-01-25 1:24 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-01-18 14:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 4/7] kvm-all: Introduce kvm_set_singlestep Fabiano Rosas
2019-01-18 14:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 5/7] target/ppc: Move handling of hardware breakpoints to a separate function Fabiano Rosas
2019-01-18 14:07 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2019-01-25 1:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 6/7] target/ppc: Refactor kvm_handle_debug Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-01-18 14:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 7/7] target/ppc: support single stepping with KVM HV Fabiano Rosas
2019-01-25 4:52 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190118140758.829-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farosas@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.