From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 22 Jan 2019 04:56:23 -0000 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1glo6o-0004K0-6S for speck@linutronix.de; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 05:56:22 +0100 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x0M4rmES047797 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 04:56:15 GMT Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2q3sde9hbk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 04:56:15 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0M4u9pB018596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 04:56:09 GMT Received: from abhmp0001.oracle.com (abhmp0001.oracle.com [141.146.116.7]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0M4u9f5023856 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 04:56:09 GMT Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:56:05 -0500 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH v5 09/27] MDSv5 23 Message-ID: <20190122045604.GM12859@char.us.oracle.com> References: <686b021bb4e5923a03e992f28770e4c06ab0662b.1547858934.git.ak@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <686b021bb4e5923a03e992f28770e4c06ab0662b.1547858934.git.ak@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 04:50:24PM -0800, speck for Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Andi Kleen > Subject: mds: Add documentation for clear cpu usage > > Including the theory, and some guide lines for subsystem/driver > maintainers. I think you should move this to best the last set of patches. The reason being that when I was reading this patchset I was looking for IRQF_NO_USER and IRQ_POLL_F_NO_USER in the previous patches.. But they were much later declared.