Re: [PATCH v6 09/16] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add utilization clamping for RT tasks

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:15:06AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> @@ -858,16 +859,23 @@ static inline void
>  uclamp_effective_get(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id,
>  		     unsigned int *clamp_value, unsigned int *bucket_id)
>  {
> +	struct uclamp_se *default_clamp;
> +
>  	/* Task specific clamp value */
>  	*clamp_value = p->uclamp[clamp_id].value;
>  	*bucket_id = p->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket_id;
>  
> +	/* RT tasks have different default values */
> +	default_clamp = task_has_rt_policy(p)
> +		? uclamp_default_perf
> +		: uclamp_default;
> +
>  	/* System default restriction */
> -	if (unlikely(*clamp_value < uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MIN].value ||
> -		     *clamp_value > uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MAX].value)) {
> +	if (unlikely(*clamp_value < default_clamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value ||
> +		     *clamp_value > default_clamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value)) {
>  		/* Keep it simple: unconditionally enforce system defaults */
> -		*clamp_value = uclamp_default[clamp_id].value;
> -		*bucket_id = uclamp_default[clamp_id].bucket_id;
> +		*clamp_value = default_clamp[clamp_id].value;
> +		*bucket_id = default_clamp[clamp_id].bucket_id;
>  	}
>  }

So I still don't much like the whole effective thing; but I think you
should use rt_task() instead of task_has_rt_policy().