diff for duplicates of <20190124151524.GF14636@google.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 5c038bb..50989ce 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -61,10 +61,10 @@ it, but I'm not very familiar with it. Maybe there's some issue with multiple devices sharing an "implicit notification" situation like this. -> As for _PRW, it?s shared by USB controller, Audio controller and ethernet. +> As for _PRW, it’s shared by USB controller, Audio controller and ethernet. > Only the ethernet (e1000e) has this issue. > -> When this issue happens, the e1000e doesn?t get woken up by ethernet cable +> When this issue happens, the e1000e doesn’t get woken up by ethernet cable > plugging, but inserting a USB device or plugging audio jack can wake up all > three devices. So I think Linux interprets ACPI correctly here. > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ this. > { > Device (HDAS) > { -> ? +> … > Method (_PRW, 0, NotSerialized) // _PRW: Power Resources for Wake > { > Return (GPRW (0x6D, 0x04)) @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ this. > { > Device (GLAN) > { -> ? +> … > Method (_PRW, 0, NotSerialized) // _PRW: Power Resources for Wake > { > Return (GPRW (0x6D, 0x04)) diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index a9b8bf7..7ec8037 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,9 +2,17 @@ "ref\020190122235134.GE14636@google.com\0" "ref\091E74111-5BB6-4604-A1D7-B537AB42C317@canonical.com\0" "From\0Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>\0" - "Subject\0[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Don't clear pme_poll on device that has unreliable ACPI wake\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Don't clear pme_poll on device that has unreliable ACPI wake\0" "Date\0Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:15:24 -0600\0" - "To\0intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org\0" + "To\0Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>\0" + "Cc\0Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>" + Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> + jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com + intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org + netdev@vger.kernel.org + linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org + linux-pci@vger.kernel.org + " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:17:37PM +0800, Kai Heng Feng wrote:\n" @@ -70,10 +78,10 @@ "multiple devices sharing an \"implicit notification\" situation like\n" "this.\n" "\n" - "> As for _PRW, it?s shared by USB controller, Audio controller and ethernet.\n" + "> As for _PRW, it\342\200\231s shared by USB controller, Audio controller and ethernet.\n" "> Only the ethernet (e1000e) has this issue.\n" "> \n" - "> When this issue happens, the e1000e doesn?t get woken up by ethernet cable\n" + "> When this issue happens, the e1000e doesn\342\200\231t get woken up by ethernet cable\n" "> plugging, but inserting a USB device or plugging audio jack can wake up all\n" "> three devices. So I think Linux interprets ACPI correctly here.\n" "> \n" @@ -93,7 +101,7 @@ "> { \n" "> Device (HDAS) \n" "> { \n" - "> ? \n" + "> \342\200\246 \n" "> Method (_PRW, 0, NotSerialized) // _PRW: Power Resources for Wake \n" "> { \n" "> Return (GPRW (0x6D, 0x04)) \n" @@ -104,7 +112,7 @@ "> { \n" "> Device (GLAN) \n" "> { \n" - "> ?\n" + "> \342\200\246\n" "> Method (_PRW, 0, NotSerialized) // _PRW: Power Resources for Wake \n" "> { \n" "> Return (GPRW (0x6D, 0x04)) \n" @@ -176,4 +184,4 @@ "> >> -- \n" > >> 2.17.1 -14b7098295e7eba2c2b2d3287e294d5718a54c87f0afd5812a6192358073707d +3c4fa76c95489b995e3ecf19b5008b2cf93948d6cf25a51cc05a68b9472ddfba
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.