From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
To: Jorge Ramirez <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Khasim Syed Mohammed <khasim.mohammed@linaro.org>,
broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcs404: evb: Fix voltages for s5 and l3
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:46:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190129224652.GB11349@centauri.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32b8136d-3acb-66e9-948c-ee8903b91401@linaro.org>
Adding Mark Brown on CC.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:58:47PM +0100, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> On 1/26/19 00:29, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > PMS405 S5 was upstreamed without a voltage and PMS405 L3 is outside the
> > acceptable range, causing PCIe to fail. Fix these.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404-evb.dtsi | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404-evb.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404-evb.dtsi
> > index 579ddaf4f5fa..072061aa1b79 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404-evb.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404-evb.dtsi
> > @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@
> > };
> >
> > vreg_s5_1p35: s5 {
> > - regulator-min-microvolt = <>;
> > - regulator-max-microvolt = <>;
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1352000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1352000>;
> > };
> >
> > vreg_l1_1p3: l1 {
> > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
> > };
> >
> > vreg_l3_1p05: l3 {
> > - regulator-min-microvolt = <976000>;
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1050000>;
>
>
> the linear range for this regulator is
> - REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(312000, 0, 127, 8000),
>
> meaning that 1050000 is actually not a valid selectable value (ie, after
> applying the above constrains 1056000 would be selected instead)
>
> In order for a driver to be able to successfully request min = 1050000,
> regulator-min-microvolt should be set to 1048000 (and 1056000 would be
> applied)
>
> the question is, should this property contain only hardware achievable
> values? or should drivers only request hardware achievable values? the
> way the constrains are implemented it has to be one of the two (I think
> the former would be more intuitive - ie if the dts
> regulator-min-microvolt is a valid value)
>
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <1160000>;
> > };
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-25 23:29 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcs404: evb: Fix voltages for s5 and l3 Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-29 21:58 ` Jorge Ramirez
2019-01-29 22:46 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2019-02-04 10:43 ` Mark Brown
2019-02-04 16:03 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-02-04 18:23 ` Mark Brown
2019-02-04 19:25 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-02-04 20:59 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190129224652.GB11349@centauri.lan \
--to=niklas.cassel@linaro.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org \
--cc=khasim.mohammed@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.