From: Alan Cox <alan@llwyncelyn.cymru>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] module: Cure the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 20:48:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190130204848.19fc6912@alans-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901291510060.1513@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
> > > + "GPL and additional rights" Historical variant of expressing that the
> > > + module source is dual licensed under a
> > > + GPL v2 variant and MIT license. Please do
> > > + not use in new code.
Actually it was a historic fix for the fact that some slimeballs were
going to use a proposed "BSD" tag and just ship binaries only whilst
claiming that they were totally compliant with the BSD licence.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-30 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-28 22:38 [PATCH][RFC] module: Cure the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity Thomas Gleixner
2019-01-29 1:32 ` Joe Perches
2019-01-29 5:27 ` Greg KH
2019-01-29 13:06 ` Jessica Yu
2019-01-29 14:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-01-30 20:48 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2019-01-30 21:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-07 0:21 ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-02-08 16:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-09 9:37 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2019-02-09 12:11 ` Greg KH
2019-02-10 18:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-11 15:19 ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-02-11 8:44 ` Jessica Yu
2019-01-30 5:01 ` [PATCH][RFC] " Rusty Russell
2019-01-30 18:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-01-30 20:45 ` Alan Cox
2019-01-30 22:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-01-31 15:18 ` Philippe Ombredanne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190130204848.19fc6912@alans-desktop \
--to=alan@llwyncelyn.cymru \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.