From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<jannh@google.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: test for BPF_F_LOCK
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:40:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190131234012.3712779-10-ast@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190131234012.3712779-1-ast@kernel.org>
Add C based test that runs 4 bpf programs in parallel
that update the same hash and array maps.
And another 2 threads that read from these two maps
via lookup(key, value, BPF_F_LOCK) api
to make sure the user space sees consistent value in both
hash and array elements while user space races with kernel bpf progs.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_map_lock.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_map_lock.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 302b8e70dec9..9de0a1ae8d65 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ BPF_OBJ_FILES = \
sendmsg4_prog.o sendmsg6_prog.o test_lirc_mode2_kern.o \
get_cgroup_id_kern.o socket_cookie_prog.o test_select_reuseport_kern.o \
test_skb_cgroup_id_kern.o bpf_flow.o netcnt_prog.o test_xdp_vlan.o \
- xdp_dummy.o test_map_in_map.o test_spin_lock.o
+ xdp_dummy.o test_map_in_map.o test_spin_lock.o test_map_lock.o
# Objects are built with default compilation flags and with sub-register
# code-gen enabled.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_map_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_map_lock.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..af8cc68ed2f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_map_lock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+// Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/version.h>
+#include "bpf_helpers.h"
+
+#define VAR_NUM 16
+
+struct hmap_elem {
+ struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
+ int var[VAR_NUM];
+};
+
+struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") hash_map = {
+ .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH,
+ .key_size = sizeof(int),
+ .value_size = sizeof(struct hmap_elem),
+ .max_entries = 1,
+};
+
+BPF_ANNOTATE_KV_PAIR(hash_map, int, struct hmap_elem);
+
+struct array_elem {
+ struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
+ int var[VAR_NUM];
+};
+
+struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") array_map = {
+ .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY,
+ .key_size = sizeof(int),
+ .value_size = sizeof(struct array_elem),
+ .max_entries = 1,
+};
+
+BPF_ANNOTATE_KV_PAIR(array_map, int, struct array_elem);
+
+SEC("map_lock_demo")
+int bpf_map_lock_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct hmap_elem zero = {}, *val;
+ int rnd = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+ int key = 0, err = 1, i;
+ struct array_elem *q;
+
+ val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash_map, &key);
+ if (!val)
+ goto err;
+ /* spin_lock in hash map */
+ bpf_spin_lock(&val->lock);
+ for (i = 0; i < VAR_NUM; i++)
+ val->var[i] = rnd;
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&val->lock);
+
+ /* spin_lock in array */
+ q = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&array_map, &key);
+ if (!q)
+ goto err;
+ bpf_spin_lock(&q->lock);
+ for (i = 0; i < VAR_NUM; i++)
+ q->var[i] = rnd;
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&q->lock);
+ err = 0;
+err:
+ return err;
+}
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index d2e71d697340..a08d026ac396 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -2025,6 +2025,79 @@ static void test_spinlock(void)
bpf_object__close(obj);
}
+static void *parallel_map_access(void *arg)
+{
+ int err, map_fd = *(u32 *) arg;
+ int vars[17], i, j, rnd, key = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, &key, vars, BPF_F_LOCK);
+ if (err) {
+ printf("lookup failed\n");
+ error_cnt++;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (vars[0] != 0) {
+ printf("lookup #%d var[0]=%d\n", i, vars[0]);
+ error_cnt++;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ rnd = vars[1];
+ for (j = 2; j < 17; j++) {
+ if (vars[j] == rnd)
+ continue;
+ printf("lookup #%d var[1]=%d var[%d]=%d\n",
+ i, rnd, j, vars[j]);
+ error_cnt++;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+out:
+ pthread_exit(arg);
+}
+
+static void test_map_lock(void)
+{
+ const char *file = "./test_map_lock.o";
+ int prog_fd, map_fd[2], vars[17] = {};
+ pthread_t thread_id[6];
+ struct bpf_object *obj;
+ int err = 0, key = 0, i;
+ void *ret;
+
+ err = bpf_prog_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, &obj, &prog_fd);
+ if (err) {
+ printf("test_map_lock:bpf_prog_load errno %d\n", errno);
+ goto close_prog;
+ }
+ map_fd[0] = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "hash_map");
+ if (map_fd[0] < 0)
+ goto close_prog;
+ map_fd[1] = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "array_map");
+ if (map_fd[1] < 0)
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd[0], &key, vars, BPF_F_LOCK);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+ assert(pthread_create(&thread_id[i], NULL,
+ &test_spin_lock, &prog_fd) == 0);
+ for (i = 4; i < 6; i++)
+ assert(pthread_create(&thread_id[i], NULL,
+ ¶llel_map_access, &map_fd[i - 4]) == 0);
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+ assert(pthread_join(thread_id[i], &ret) == 0 &&
+ ret == (void *)&prog_fd);
+ for (i = 4; i < 6; i++)
+ assert(pthread_join(thread_id[i], &ret) == 0 &&
+ ret == (void *)&map_fd[i - 4]);
+ goto close_prog_noerr;
+close_prog:
+ error_cnt++;
+close_prog_noerr:
+ bpf_object__close(obj);
+}
+
int main(void)
{
srand(time(NULL));
@@ -2054,6 +2127,7 @@ int main(void)
test_queue_stack_map(STACK);
test_flow_dissector();
test_spinlock();
+ test_map_lock();
printf("Summary: %d PASSED, %d FAILED\n", pass_cnt, error_cnt);
return error_cnt ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS;
--
2.20.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-31 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 23:40 [PATCH v7 bpf-next 0/9] introduce bpf_spin_lock Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-31 23:40 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 1/9] bpf: " Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-31 23:40 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 2/9] bpf: add support for bpf_spin_lock to cgroup local storage Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-31 23:40 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 3/9] tools/bpf: sync include/uapi/linux/bpf.h Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-31 23:40 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 4/9] selftests/bpf: add bpf_spin_lock verifier tests Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-31 23:40 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 5/9] selftests/bpf: add bpf_spin_lock C test Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-31 23:40 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 6/9] bpf: introduce BPF_F_LOCK flag Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-31 23:40 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 7/9] tools/bpf: sync uapi/bpf.h Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-31 23:40 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 8/9] libbpf: introduce bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags() Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-31 23:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2019-02-01 20:07 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 0/9] introduce bpf_spin_lock Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190131234012.3712779-10-ast@kernel.org \
--to=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.