All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	eranian@google.com, vincent.weaver@maine.edu,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: System crash with perf_fuzzer (kernel: 5.0.0-rc3)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 08:43:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190201074353.GA8778@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190131082711.GC24233@krava>

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:27:11AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 07:36:48PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > index 280a72b3a553..22ec63a0782e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -4969,6 +4969,26 @@ static void __perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event,
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
> > +{
> > +	u64 sample_period_attr = event->attr.sample_period;
> > +	u64 sample_period_hw   = event->hw.sample_period;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (event->attr.freq) {
> > +		event->attr.sample_freq = value;
> > +	} else {
> > +		event->attr.sample_period = value;
> > +		event->hw.sample_period = value;
> > +	}
> 
> hm, I think we need to check the period without changing the event,
> because we don't disable pmu, so it might get picked up by bts code
> 
> will check

with attached patch I did not trigger the fuzzer crash
for over a day now, could you guys try?

thanks,
jirka


---
 arch/x86/events/core.c       | 14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c |  9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/perf_event.h   |  5 +++++
 kernel/events/core.c         | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 374a19712e20..b684f0294f35 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2278,6 +2278,19 @@ void perf_check_microcode(void)
 		x86_pmu.check_microcode();
 }
 
+static int x86_pmu_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
+{
+	if (x86_pmu.check_period && x86_pmu.check_period(event, value))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (value && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
+		if (x86_pmu.limit_period(event, value) > value)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct pmu pmu = {
 	.pmu_enable		= x86_pmu_enable,
 	.pmu_disable		= x86_pmu_disable,
@@ -2302,6 +2315,7 @@ static struct pmu pmu = {
 	.event_idx		= x86_pmu_event_idx,
 	.sched_task		= x86_pmu_sched_task,
 	.task_ctx_size          = sizeof(struct x86_perf_task_context),
+	.check_period		= x86_pmu_check_period,
 };
 
 void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 8b4e3020aba2..a3fbbd33beef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3586,6 +3586,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 	intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(ctx, sched_in);
 }
 
+static int intel_pmu_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
+{
+	return intel_pmu_has_bts_period(event, value) ? -EINVAL : 0;
+}
+
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(offcore_rsp, "config1:0-63");
 
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(ldlat, "config1:0-15");
@@ -3665,6 +3670,8 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu core_pmu = {
 	.cpu_prepare		= intel_pmu_cpu_prepare,
 	.cpu_starting		= intel_pmu_cpu_starting,
 	.cpu_dying		= intel_pmu_cpu_dying,
+
+	.check_period		= intel_pmu_check_period,
 };
 
 static struct attribute *intel_pmu_attrs[];
@@ -3707,6 +3714,8 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu intel_pmu = {
 	.cpu_dying		= intel_pmu_cpu_dying,
 	.guest_get_msrs		= intel_guest_get_msrs,
 	.sched_task		= intel_pmu_sched_task,
+
+	.check_period		= intel_pmu_check_period,
 };
 
 static __init void intel_clovertown_quirk(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 78d7b7031bfc..d46fd6754d92 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -646,6 +646,11 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	 * Intel host/guest support (KVM)
 	 */
 	struct perf_guest_switch_msr *(*guest_get_msrs)(int *nr);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check period value for PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD ioctl.
+	 */
+	int (*check_period) (struct perf_event *event, u64 period);
 };
 
 struct x86_perf_task_context {
@@ -857,7 +862,7 @@ static inline int amd_pmu_init(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
 
-static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(struct perf_event *event)
+static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 period)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	unsigned int hw_event, bts_event;
@@ -868,7 +873,14 @@ static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(struct perf_event *event)
 	hw_event = hwc->config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
 	bts_event = x86_pmu.event_map(PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS);
 
-	return hw_event == bts_event && hwc->sample_period == 1;
+	return hw_event == bts_event && period == 1;
+}
+
+static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+
+	return intel_pmu_has_bts_period(event, hwc->sample_period);
 }
 
 int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event);
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index f2f9f8592d42..0a7d4d6a3660 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -447,6 +447,11 @@ struct pmu {
 	 * Filter events for PMU-specific reasons.
 	 */
 	int (*filter_match)		(struct perf_event *event); /* optional */
+
+	/*
+	 * Check period value for PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD ioctl.
+	 */
+	int (*check_period)		(struct perf_event *event, u64 value); /* optional */
 };
 
 enum perf_addr_filter_action_t {
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 214c434ddc1b..edd92dc556fb 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4969,6 +4969,11 @@ static void __perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event,
 	}
 }
 
+static int perf_event_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
+{
+	return event->pmu->check_period(event, value);
+}
+
 static int perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 __user *arg)
 {
 	u64 value;
@@ -4985,6 +4990,9 @@ static int perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 __user *arg)
 	if (event->attr.freq && value > sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (perf_event_check_period(event, value))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	event_function_call(event, __perf_event_period, &value);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -9601,6 +9609,11 @@ static int perf_pmu_nop_int(struct pmu *pmu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int perf_event_nop_int(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nop_txn_flags);
 
 static void perf_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu, unsigned int flags)
@@ -9901,6 +9914,9 @@ int perf_pmu_register(struct pmu *pmu, const char *name, int type)
 		pmu->pmu_disable = perf_pmu_nop_void;
 	}
 
+	if (!pmu->check_period)
+		pmu->check_period = perf_event_nop_int;
+
 	if (!pmu->event_idx)
 		pmu->event_idx = perf_event_idx_default;
 
-- 
2.17.2

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-01  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-25  6:46 System crash with perf_fuzzer (kernel: 5.0.0-rc3) Ravi Bangoria
2019-01-25 15:11 ` Vince Weaver
2019-01-25 16:00 ` Andi Kleen
2019-01-31  7:58   ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-01-31 13:00     ` Andi Kleen
2019-01-31 20:27   ` Cong Wang
2019-01-31 20:39     ` Andi Kleen
2019-03-06 23:09   ` Pavel Machek
2019-01-30 18:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-01-30 20:39   ` Andi Kleen
2019-01-30 22:33     ` Jiri Olsa
2019-01-31  7:36   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-01-31  8:27   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-02-01  7:43     ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-02-01  7:54       ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-02-02  3:24         ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-02-02 10:34           ` Jiri Olsa
2019-02-01 16:27       ` Vince Weaver
2019-02-01 17:38         ` Jiri Olsa
2019-02-02 17:58           ` Vince Weaver
2019-02-04 12:35             ` [PATCH] perf: Add check_period pmu callback Jiri Olsa
2019-02-11 10:11               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 13:22               ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Add check_period PMU callback tip-bot for Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190201074353.GA8778@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.