From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: jglisse@redhat.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/mmu_notifier: use unsigned for event field in range struct
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 20:13:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190202011340.GD12463@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190131183706.20980-3-jglisse@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 01:37:04PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
>
> Use unsigned for event field in range struct so that we can also set
> flags with the event. This patch change the field and introduce the
> helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> index be873c431886..d7a35975c2bd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
> #include <linux/srcu.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>
> struct mmu_notifier;
> struct mmu_notifier_ops;
> @@ -38,8 +39,11 @@ enum mmu_notifier_event {
> MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA,
> MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_PAGE,
> MMU_NOTIFY_SOFT_DIRTY,
> + MMU_NOTIFY_EVENT_MAX
> };
>
> +#define MMU_NOTIFIER_EVENT_BITS order_base_2(MMU_NOTIFY_EVENT_MAX)
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
>
> /*
> @@ -60,7 +64,7 @@ struct mmu_notifier_range {
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> unsigned long start;
> unsigned long end;
> - enum mmu_notifier_event event;
> + unsigned event;
> bool blockable;
> };
This is only allocated in the stack, so saving RAM by mixing bitfields
with enum in the same 4 bytes to save 4 bytes isn't of maximum
priority.
A possibly cleaner way to save those 4 bytes without mixing enum with
bitfields by hand, is to add a "unsigned short flags" which will make
"event/flags/blockable" fit in the same 8 bytes (bool only needs 1
byte) as before the patch (the first bitfield can start from 0 then).
Yet another way is to drop blockable and convert it to a flag in
"unsigned int flags".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-02 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 18:37 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Restore change_pte optimization to its former glory jglisse
2019-01-31 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] uprobes: use set_pte_at() not set_pte_at_notify() jglisse
2019-02-02 0:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-11 19:27 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-31 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/mmu_notifier: use unsigned for event field in range struct jglisse
2019-02-02 1:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2019-01-31 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/mmu_notifier: set MMU_NOTIFIER_USE_CHANGE_PTE flag where appropriate jglisse
2019-01-31 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] kvm/mmu_notifier: re-enable the change_pte() optimization jglisse
2019-02-01 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Restore change_pte optimization to its former glory Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-02 0:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-11 19:09 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-11 20:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-18 16:04 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-18 17:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-18 18:20 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-19 2:37 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-19 2:43 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-19 3:33 ` Jerome Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190202011340.GD12463@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.