From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2019 14:38:38 +0000 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find (2) In-Reply-To: <20190131144259.23563-1-agruenba@redhat.com> References: <20190131144259.23563-1-agruenba@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20190202143839.8F43320856@mail.kernel.org> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 2d29f6b96d8f gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find. The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.6, v4.19.19, v4.14.97, v4.9.154, v4.4.172, v3.18.133. v4.20.6: Build OK! v4.19.19: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") v4.14.97: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too long") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") v4.9.154: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d1c7ae9d849 ("GFS2: Prevent BUG from occurring when normal Withdraws occur") 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") 9862ca056e65 ("GFS2: Switch tr_touched to flag in transaction") dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too long") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") ed17545d01e4 ("GFS2: Allow glocks to be unlocked after withdraw") v4.4.172: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d1c7ae9d849 ("GFS2: Prevent BUG from occurring when normal Withdraws occur") 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") 3e11e5304150 ("GFS2: ignore unlock failures after withdraw") 471f3db2786b ("gfs2: change gfs2 readdir cookie") 9862ca056e65 ("GFS2: Switch tr_touched to flag in transaction") dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too long") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") ed17545d01e4 ("GFS2: Allow glocks to be unlocked after withdraw") v3.18.133: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d1c7ae9d849 ("GFS2: Prevent BUG from occurring when normal Withdraws occur") 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") 2e60d7683c8d ("GFS2: update freeze code to use freeze/thaw_super on all nodes") 3cdcf63ed2d1 ("GFS2: use kvfree() instead of open-coding it") 3e11e5304150 ("GFS2: ignore unlock failures after withdraw") 471f3db2786b ("gfs2: change gfs2 readdir cookie") 9862ca056e65 ("GFS2: Switch tr_touched to flag in transaction") a3e3213676d8 ("gfs2: fix shadow warning in gfs2_rbm_find()") dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too long") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") ed17545d01e4 ("GFS2: Allow glocks to be unlocked after withdraw") How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7BBC282D7 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C8620869 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:38:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549118321; bh=+lYuoZe16nGnYJuLcFKrJwo/BIFfYQsCdnBqg0nzab0=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID: From; b=n0Es0+FFfgZqo3cwthy1QCNdNm3bAxGBs6TlAeSMrv//yqbBZBmaDoE18BbfpHgwQ Z+eefHHFffpFEbj/RKc7/i3YF+hfwQR1g8n1Oh8u25IipjNK4sN9Fw21mg51YRtbo6 wu5YBTY+uaPYyCvdWBhLePUEcjt8bcJ/RMXVzIXA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726617AbfBBOik (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2019 09:38:40 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50016 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725853AbfBBOik (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2019 09:38:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [23.100.24.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F43320856; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:38:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549118319; bh=+lYuoZe16nGnYJuLcFKrJwo/BIFfYQsCdnBqg0nzab0=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CI1qlIu4GRbwftG9f6ZNx1U4BfVgwhZX1pBK+CXwBFghCRezClPgSFDloGRrzyKfc 9lgvtKEX2qd08/JTdXMiBn+SgTUYA4IC1Od6sFQoRMToHEccluspjoSfQEg2+wJ47F esiIFD7DETnsEtGtMzCITP96FgJLI672sDiteZM8= Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2019 14:38:38 +0000 From: Sasha Levin To: Sasha Levin To: Andreas Gruenbacher To: cluster-devel@redhat.com Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find (2) In-Reply-To: <20190131144259.23563-1-agruenba@redhat.com> References: <20190131144259.23563-1-agruenba@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190202143839.8F43320856@mail.kernel.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 2d29f6b96d8f gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find. The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.6, v4.19.19, v4.14.97, v4.9.154, v4.4.172, v3.18.133. v4.20.6: Build OK! v4.19.19: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") v4.14.97: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too long") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") v4.9.154: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d1c7ae9d849 ("GFS2: Prevent BUG from occurring when normal Withdraws occur") 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") 9862ca056e65 ("GFS2: Switch tr_touched to flag in transaction") dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too long") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") ed17545d01e4 ("GFS2: Allow glocks to be unlocked after withdraw") v4.4.172: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d1c7ae9d849 ("GFS2: Prevent BUG from occurring when normal Withdraws occur") 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") 3e11e5304150 ("GFS2: ignore unlock failures after withdraw") 471f3db2786b ("gfs2: change gfs2 readdir cookie") 9862ca056e65 ("GFS2: Switch tr_touched to flag in transaction") dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too long") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") ed17545d01e4 ("GFS2: Allow glocks to be unlocked after withdraw") v3.18.133: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d1c7ae9d849 ("GFS2: Prevent BUG from occurring when normal Withdraws occur") 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}") 2e60d7683c8d ("GFS2: update freeze code to use freeze/thaw_super on all nodes") 3cdcf63ed2d1 ("GFS2: use kvfree() instead of open-coding it") 3e11e5304150 ("GFS2: ignore unlock failures after withdraw") 471f3db2786b ("gfs2: change gfs2 readdir cookie") 9862ca056e65 ("GFS2: Switch tr_touched to flag in transaction") a3e3213676d8 ("gfs2: fix shadow warning in gfs2_rbm_find()") dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too long") e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we can") ed17545d01e4 ("GFS2: Allow glocks to be unlocked after withdraw") How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha