From: tomli@tomli.me
To: "Aaro Koskinen" <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 4.20-rc1] 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu: Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds")
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 09:22:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206012214.GA25642@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190205185914.GB16356@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>
> OK, thanks. This looks slightly different from the Loongson problem:
>
> - In Loongson, we don't get stuck in RCU, but in
> cpufreq_dbs_governor_stop -> irq_work_sync().
>
> - I run non-preemptible kernel, and my system still gets stuck.
>
> What is common is that it's UP with i8259 PIC.
>
> A.
Now it's an interesting case. Because on my machine, the problem I
encountered seems to be the identical one of the original thread,
disabling preempting can effectively solve the lockup. Also, my
issue is not only occuring on 4.20-rc1, but also on earlier kernels,
with a lower probability.
But on your machine, you have another non-identical, but closely-
related issue. It seems the timing-dependent lockup of i8259 PIC can
be triggered in different ways.
The conclusion is clear though, there's a real lockup condition in
i8259 PIC driver, and it's causing real issues. Aaro, have you tried
submitting your i8259 patch to the mainline? Despite your concerns
about its underlying cause, I think a fix should be submitted. If there
are no objections from the maintainers, I suggest submitting it to the
mainline upstream, and send it to linux-stable, requesting it to be
applied on 3.16, 4.4, 4.9, 4.14, 4.19, 4.20 stable branches. If you
are busy, I can help submitting.
Tom Li
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-06 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-13 13:54 [REGRESSION 4.20-rc1] 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu: Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds") Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-13 15:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-14 20:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-26 22:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-05 5:07 ` Tom Li
2019-02-05 9:58 ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-02-05 13:05 ` Tom Li
2019-02-05 18:59 ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-02-06 1:22 ` tomli [this message]
2019-04-15 13:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-04-15 14:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190206012214.GA25642@x220 \
--to=tomli@tomli.me \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.