All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] common: fix kmemleak to work with sections
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 09:06:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206170654.GC29630@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190203091049.GN2713@desktop>

On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 05:10:49PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 08:17:25AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Refactor the kmemleak code to work correctly with sections.  This
> 
> Thanks for the fix!
> 
> > requires changing the report location to use RESULT_DIR instead of
> > RESULT_BASE, and clarifying which functions get used when.
> 
> But I didn't see any RESULT_DIR related changes in this patch.

I forgot to update the commit log. :(

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  check     |    4 ++--
> >  common/rc |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/check b/check
> > index c0eee0aa..b9eb86cb 100755
> > --- a/check
> > +++ b/check
> > @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ _expunge_test()
> >  	return 0
> >  }
> >  
> > -_init_kmemleak
> > +_detect_kmemleak
> >  _prepare_test_list
> >  
> >  if $OPTIONS_HAVE_SECTIONS; then
> > @@ -793,8 +793,8 @@ for section in $HOST_OPTIONS_SECTIONS; do
> >  			# and log messages that shouldn't be there.
> >  			_check_filesystems
> >  			_check_dmesg || err=true
> > -			_check_kmemleak || err=true
> >  		fi
> > +		_check_kmemleak || err=true
> 
> So we check for kmemleak after each test even when the test already
> failed, better to have some comments here to explain why this is
> necessary.

I'll add this in the next version:

	# Scan for memory leaks after every test so that associating
	# a leak to a particular test will be as accurate as possible.

> >  
> >  		# test ends after all checks are done.
> >  		$timestamp && _timestamp
> > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > index 19e947df..75771f31 100644
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ _check_dmesg()
> >  # capture the kmemleak report
> >  _capture_kmemleak()
> >  {
> > -	local kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > +	local kern_knob="$DEBUGFS_MNT/kmemleak"
> 
> Just wondering why the "{}" are removed in this patch?

Making the variable dereferencing consistent with the rest of fstests.

> >  	local leak_file="$1"
> >  
> >  	# Tell the kernel to scan for memory leaks.  Apparently the write
> > @@ -3535,17 +3535,20 @@ ENDL
> >  	echo "clear" > "$kern_knob"
> >  }
> >  
> > -# set up kmemleak
> > -_init_kmemleak()
> > +# Figure out if the running kernel supports kmemleak; if it does, clear out
> > +# anything that leaked before we even started testing.  The leak checker only
> > +# needs to be primed like this once per ./check invocation.
> > +_detect_kmemleak()
> >  {
> > -	local kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > +	local kern_knob="$DEBUGFS_MNT/kmemleak"
> > +	KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE="/tmp/check_kmemleak"
> 
> So we're checking the "/tmp/check_kmemleak" file instead of

Right.

> ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak now, but from the commit log it seems that
> it should be ${RESULT_DIR}/check_kmemleak?

Er... oops.  I'll update the changelog. :)

> >  
> >  	# Since kernel v4.19-rc3, the kmemleak knob exists even if kmemleak is
> >  	# disabled, but returns EBUSY on write. So instead of relying on
> >  	# existance of writable knob file, we use a test file to indicate that
> >  	# _check_kmemleak() is enabled only if we actually managed to write to
> >  	# the knob file.
> > -	rm -f ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak
> > +	rm -f "$KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE"
> >  
> >  	if [ ! -w "$kern_knob" ]; then
> >  		return 0
> > @@ -3555,17 +3558,26 @@ _init_kmemleak()
> >  	# then dump all the leaks recorded so far.
> >  	if echo "scan=off" > "$kern_knob" 2>/dev/null; then
> >  		_capture_kmemleak /dev/null
> > -		touch ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak
> > +		touch "$KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE"
> >  	fi
> >  }
> >  
> > -# check kmemleak log
> > +# Kick the kmemleak checker to scan for leaks.  Background leak scan mode is
> > +# not enabled, so we must call the kernel to ask for a scan and deal with the
> > +# results appropriately.  This we do after every test completes, whether or not
> > +# it was successful.
> >  _check_kmemleak()
> >  {
> > -	local kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > -	local leak_file="${seqres}.kmemleak"
> > +	local kern_knob="$DEBUGFS_MNT/kmemleak"
> > +	local leak_file="$seqres.kmemleak"
> >  
> > -	if [ ! -f ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak ]; then
> > +	if [ ! -f "$KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE" ]; then
> > +		return 0
> > +	fi
> > +
> > +	# Not enabled, so discard any report of leaks found.
> > +	if [ "$USE_KMEMLEAK" != "yes" ]; then
> > +		_capture_kmemleak /dev/null
> 
> New knob requires new documentation in README :)

Will do.  Happy New Year, by the way!

--D

> Thanks,
> Eryu
> 
> >  		return 0
> >  	fi
> >  
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-06 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-29 16:17 [PATCH 1/4] xfs/093: make sure the scratch directory still exists after repair Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs/138: format the scratch device before using it Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] common: fix kmemleak to work with sections Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-03  9:10   ` Eryu Guan
2019-02-06 17:06     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-01-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] generic: check for reasonable inode creation time Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-03  9:14   ` Eryu Guan
2019-02-06 16:41     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190206170654.GC29630@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.