From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:57:25 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] core/pkg-infra: tweak only .la files that need it In-Reply-To: References: <20190210084840.309-1-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Message-ID: <20190210195725.GM3079@scaer> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, All, On 2019-02-10 20:23 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire spake thusly: > El dom., 10 feb. 2019 a las 9:48, Yann E. MORIN > () escribi?: > > > > Currently, when we tweak the .la files, we do so unconditionally on all > > .la files, even those we already fixed in a previous run. > > > > This has the nasty side effect that each .la file will be reported as > > being touched by all packages that are installed after the package that > > actually installed said .la file. > > > > Since we can't easily know what fiels were isntalled by a package (that > > files > installed > > > is an instrumetnation hook, and comes after the mangling), we use a > > instrumentation > > > trick (like is done in libtool?): we do mangle all files, each in into a > > /in/d > > > temporary location; if the result is identical to the input, we remove > > the temporary, while if the resiult differes from the output, we move > > result differs OK, so it looks like my new glasses are not up to the task of fixing my eyesight, since I could not spot any of those mistakes when proof-reading myself... Or maybe it is not my eyes that are deffective, in fact? > > the temporary to the input. > > > > Reported-by: Nicolas Cavallari > > Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni > > Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" > > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni > > Cc: Nicolas Cavallari > > Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire > > Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle > > --- > > package/pkg-generic.mk | 12 ++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/package/pkg-generic.mk b/package/pkg-generic.mk > > index 6168b40e89..afd0d41e2a 100644 > > --- a/package/pkg-generic.mk > > +++ b/package/pkg-generic.mk > > @@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_staging_installed: > > $(addprefix $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/bin/,$($(PKG)_CONFIG_SCRIPTS)) ;\ > > fi > > @$(call MESSAGE,"Fixing libtool files") > > - $(Q)find $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib* -name "*.la" | xargs --no-run-if-empty \ > > + $(Q)for la in $(find $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib* -name "*.la"); do \ Meh... The real culp[rit for the borked patch is that $(find ...) is not the same as $$(find ...) here... So the loop is never, ever entered, and the issue below... > > + cp -a "$${la}" "$${la}.fixed" && \ > > $(SED) "s:$(BASE_DIR):@BASE_DIR@:g" \ > > -e "s:$(STAGING_DIR):@STAGING_DIR@:g" \ > > $(if $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR),\ > > @@ -303,7 +304,14 @@ $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_staging_installed: > > $(if $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR),\ > > -e "s:@TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR@:$(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR):g") \ > > -e "s:@STAGING_DIR@:$(STAGING_DIR):g" \ > > - -e "s:@BASE_DIR@:$(BASE_DIR):g" > > + -e "s:@BASE_DIR@:$(BASE_DIR):g"; \ > > The semicolon shouldn't be here, right? I.e. the "$${la}.fixed" below > is the argument to the sed command, no? ... is not noticed. Regards, Yann E. MORIN. > > + "$${la}.fixed" && \ > > + if cmp "$${la}" "$${la}.fixed"; then \ > > + rm -f "$${la}.fixed"; \ > > + else \ > > + mv "$${la}.fixed" "$${la}"; \ > > + fi || exit 1; \ > > + done > > @$(call step_end,install-staging) > > $(Q)touch $@ > > > > I did not test it but it looks a valid approach. > > Best regards, > Thomas -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'