From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:42:51 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/20] x86: avoid W^X being broken during modules loading Message-ID: <20190211194251.GS19618@zn.tnic> References: <20190129003422.9328-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20190129003422.9328-11-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20190211182956.GN19618@zn.tnic> <1533F2BB-2284-499B-9912-6D74D0B87BC1@gmail.com> <20190211190108.GP19618@zn.tnic> <20190211191059.GR19618@zn.tnic> <3996E3F9-92D2-4561-84E9-68B43AC60F43@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3996E3F9-92D2-4561-84E9-68B43AC60F43@gmail.com> To: Nadav Amit Cc: Rick Edgecombe , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , LKML , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Damian Tometzki , linux-integrity , LSM List , Andrew Morton , Kernel Hardening , Linux-MM , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Kristen Carlson Accardi , "Dock, Deneen T" , Kees Cook , Dave Hansen , Masami Hiramatsu List-ID: On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:27:03AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote: > Is there any comment over static_cpu_has()? ;-) Almost: /* * Static testing of CPU features. Used the same as boot_cpu_has(). * These will statically patch the target code for additional * performance. */ static __always_inline __pure bool _static_cpu_has(u16 bit) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.