From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EA5C282C4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDE4214DA for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729801AbfBLNJv (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:09:51 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42316 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728631AbfBLNJt (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:09:49 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99B0C10F80; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.43.17.136]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F0F215C239; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:09:46 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Alexey Budankov Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Namhyung Kim , Alexander Shishkin , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] perf record: implement -z= and --mmap-flush= options Message-ID: <20190212130946.GQ775@krava> References: <044ee2be-2e1d-e90f-7317-40083b5e716c@linux.intel.com> <2d676199-bfe0-d8e0-442e-41280046f819@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2d676199-bfe0-d8e0-442e-41280046f819@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:22:38PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote: SNIP > @@ -1147,6 +1193,10 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv) > fd = perf_data__fd(data); > rec->session = session; > > + rec->opts.comp_level = 0; > + session->header.env.comp_level = rec->opts.comp_level; > + session->header.env.comp_type = PERF_COMP_NONE; > + > record__init_features(rec); > > if (rec->opts.use_clockid && rec->opts.clockid_res_ns) > @@ -1176,6 +1226,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv) > err = -1; > goto out_child; > } > + session->header.env.comp_mmap_len = session->evlist->mmap_len; so the comp_mmap_len is the max length of the compressed packet? any idea if this value might have some impact on the processing speed? I see you mentioned the size reduction, could you also meassure the record overhead? thanks, jirka