From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFADEC282C4 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792E02175B for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:45:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550025949; bh=gUzJCtwM1Qj53OsYalAQHpukP2W5w9/r/9HTZH1r2tE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=tRQ0Brteldsj1xt7J2QFHvIe14L6kjeRJ4bXKHY5bZ2+3j0+7yAgweRiPjZXztKOA c1JXUvc6Uyx/FegIgvGtCjSltwXHhiKF8b6wWM6SMwDhpDKNCihy/XMvPRtXbnSOQ8 w/+1YzNsySSnB9aeYoLwgxFrz6U3Ckk2IsBADpQc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389122AbfBMCk5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:40:57 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44500 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389074AbfBMCkp (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:40:45 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C09AF222C2; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:40:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550025644; bh=gUzJCtwM1Qj53OsYalAQHpukP2W5w9/r/9HTZH1r2tE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LJx/ZE5gwQEZyypr9RWmmbDayv/RHRQZ9fY1YmGwRgYFi37ieYXem1e78bZPCqdmG J2C9XVGKM5nVfic3hTi56jufLyBX68JuwDXEXhMy7DzclqcDbof3MPXmiNpki1SLbB A0wHDGPLruRgpybY40je2rYPRRf5koijXWtKd/ZE= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Nathan Chancellor , Lee Jones , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 03/21] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Fix some section annotations Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:40:22 -0500 Message-Id: <20190213024040.21740-3-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20190213024040.21740-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190213024040.21740-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Nathan Chancellor [ Upstream commit a3888f62fe66429fad3be7f2ba962e1e08c26fd6 ] When building the kernel with Clang, the following section mismatch warnings appear: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x7239cc): Section mismatch in reference from the function db8500_prcmu_probe() to the function .init.text:init_prcm_registers() The function db8500_prcmu_probe() references the function __init init_prcm_registers(). This is often because db8500_prcmu_probe lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of init_prcm_registers is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x723e28): Section mismatch in reference from the function db8500_prcmu_probe() to the function .init.text:fw_project_name() The function db8500_prcmu_probe() references the function __init fw_project_name(). This is often because db8500_prcmu_probe lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of fw_project_name is wrong. db8500_prcmu_probe should not be marked as __init so remove the __init annotation from fw_project_name and init_prcm_registers. Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c index ca38a6a14110..26ccf3f4ade9 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c @@ -2588,7 +2588,7 @@ static struct irq_chip prcmu_irq_chip = { .irq_unmask = prcmu_irq_unmask, }; -static __init char *fw_project_name(u32 project) +static char *fw_project_name(u32 project) { switch (project) { case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8500: @@ -2736,7 +2736,7 @@ void __init db8500_prcmu_early_init(u32 phy_base, u32 size) INIT_WORK(&mb0_transfer.mask_work, prcmu_mask_work); } -static void __init init_prcm_registers(void) +static void init_prcm_registers(void) { u32 val; -- 2.19.1