From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 15 Feb 2019 17:44:16 -0000 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1guhX5-000697-2Q for speck@linutronix.de; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:44:15 +0100 Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1guhX3-0007xV-2A for speck@linutronix.de; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:44:13 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:44:10 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [RFC][PATCH] performance walnuts Message-ID: <20190215174410.GQ32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <3dd5d6e2bc9ac53f826c251c68ce84fcc79a6872.1549582769.git.ak@linux.intel.com> <20190208090147.GK32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190208093950.GD32534@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190208105318.GE32534@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190213025634.GA9876@mgross-MOBL.amr.corp.intel.com> <20190215173247.GA11340@mgross-MOBL.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190215173247.GA11340@mgross-MOBL.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 09:32:47AM -0800, speck for mark gross wrote: > Oh I'm told we need to avoid > using the internal codenames in our patches. Then don't expose us to them. I will forever think of broken TSX whenever I see a walnut now. Anyway; I'll stare at the fails next week.