From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org,
Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>,
Tony Brelinski <tonyx.brelinski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [stable 4.19 2/4] ice: Updates to Tx scheduler code
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:25:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190218122505.GD30260@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe53b30f53eb301457a265197dfe08dbd1d307b1.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 03:46:26PM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 12:28 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 12:50:27PM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > From: Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>
> > >
> > > This is a backport of the mainline commit b36c598c999c ("ice:
> > > Updates to Tx scheduler code"). This change is required for the
> > > driver to work with the latest firmware. Without this patch,
> > > the driver fails probe.
> >
> > Note, this is a big change. You can't have these systems just run
> > the
> > old firmware? The fact that you require a kernel change for newer
> > firmware, isn't the best, you don't provide backwards compatibility
> > somehow?
> >
> > I'm all for adding new device ids and the like to stable kernels, but
> > to
> > backport new functionality just to get newer hardware to work on
> > older
> > kernels, is not the goal of the LTS kernel trees. Why can't you just
> > have users use 4.20 or newer? There shouldn't be anything keeping
> > them
> > from doing that and just updating to the latest stable release every
> > 4
> > months or so, right?
>
> Sorry Greg, I am not ignoring you. I have been trying to get more
> information and reasoning from others within Intel which needed this
> support within the 4.19 kernel. I am hoping I will have a response for
> you by Monday.
It's been more than one "Monday" now, so I'm dropping this series from
my patch queue.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-18 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-01 20:50 [stable 4.19 0/4] Intel Wired Ethernet Fixes for 4.19.y Jeff Kirsher
2019-02-01 20:50 ` [stable 4.19 1/4] ice: Update expected FW version Jeff Kirsher
2019-02-02 9:02 ` Greg KH
2019-02-01 20:50 ` [stable 4.19 2/4] ice: Updates to Tx scheduler code Jeff Kirsher
2019-02-02 11:28 ` Greg KH
2019-02-08 23:46 ` Jeff Kirsher
2019-02-18 12:25 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-02-19 15:57 ` Jeff Kirsher
2019-02-01 20:50 ` [stable 4.19 3/4] ice: Introduce ice_dev_onetime_setup Jeff Kirsher
2019-02-01 20:50 ` [stable 4.19 4/4] ice: Set timeout when disabling queues Jeff Kirsher
2019-02-02 9:00 ` [stable 4.19 0/4] Intel Wired Ethernet Fixes for 4.19.y Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190218122505.GD30260@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonyx.brelinski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.