From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>, "jiri@resnulli.us" <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"jhs@mojatatu.com" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
"xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: sched: flower: refactor fl_change
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:20:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190218192020.5c83a494@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vbf8syhja0k.fsf@mellanox.com>
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 16:25:52 +0000
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> wrote:
> On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 10:47, Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Ah, of course. Thanks for clarifying. By the way, what tricked me here
> > was this check in fl_change():
> >
> > if (fold && handle && fold->handle != handle)
> > ...
> >
> > which could be turned into:
> >
> > if (fold && fold->handle != handle)
> > ...
> >
> > at this point.
>
> At this point I don't think this check is needed at all because fold
> can't suddenly change its handle in between this check and initial
> lookup in cls API.
Oh, right.
> Looking at commit history, this check is present since original commit
> by Jiri that implements flower classifier. Maybe semantics of cls API
> was different back then?
I wasn't able to figure that out either... Jiri?
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-18 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 7:47 [PATCH net-next 00/12] Refactor flower classifier to remove dependency on rtnl lock Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] net: sched: flower: don't check for rtnl on head dereference Vlad Buslov
2019-02-18 19:08 ` Cong Wang
2019-02-19 9:45 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-20 22:33 ` Cong Wang
2019-02-21 17:45 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-22 19:32 ` Cong Wang
2019-02-25 16:11 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-25 22:39 ` Cong Wang
2019-02-26 14:57 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-28 0:49 ` Cong Wang
2019-02-28 18:35 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-03-02 0:51 ` Cong Wang
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: sched: flower: refactor fl_change Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 20:34 ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-15 10:38 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-15 10:47 ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-15 16:25 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-18 18:20 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] net: sched: flower: introduce reference counting for filters Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 20:34 ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-15 11:22 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-15 12:32 ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] net: sched: flower: track filter deletion with flag Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 20:49 ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-15 15:54 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] net: sched: flower: add reference counter to flower mask Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] net: sched: flower: handle concurrent mask insertion Vlad Buslov
2019-02-15 22:46 ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] net: sched: flower: protect masks list with spinlock Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] net: sched: flower: handle concurrent filter insertion in fl_change Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] net: sched: flower: handle concurrent tcf proto deletion Vlad Buslov
2019-02-18 20:47 ` Cong Wang
2019-02-19 14:08 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] net: sched: flower: protect flower classifier state with spinlock Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] net: sched: flower: track rtnl lock state Vlad Buslov
2019-02-15 22:46 ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-18 9:35 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] net: sched: flower: set unlocked flag for flower proto ops Vlad Buslov
2019-02-18 19:27 ` Cong Wang
2019-02-19 10:15 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-20 22:36 ` Cong Wang
2019-02-18 19:15 ` [PATCH net-next 00/12] Refactor flower classifier to remove dependency on rtnl lock Cong Wang
2019-02-19 10:00 ` Vlad Buslov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190218192020.5c83a494@redhat.com \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladbu@mellanox.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.