From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
len.brown@intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf/x86/intel: Introduce a concept "domain" as the scope of counters
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:12:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190220111226.GG32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1550606411-5313-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:00:02PM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> It's very useful to abstract several common topology related codes for
> these modules to reduce the code redundancy.
> 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
So you add 100 lines, so we can remove lines when we start to use this.
Except all 3 follow up patches that employ this, all add more lines
still:
1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
1 file changed, 224 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-20 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-19 20:00 [PATCH 00/10] perf: Multi-die/package support kan.liang
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf/x86/intel: Introduce a concept "domain" as the scope of counters kan.liang
2019-02-20 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-02-20 14:36 ` Liang, Kan
2019-03-05 20:32 ` Liang, Kan
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf/x86/intel/cstate: Apply "domain" for cstate kan.liang
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 03/10] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Apply "domain" for uncore kan.liang
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf/x86/intel/rapl: Apply "domain" for RAPL kan.liang
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf/x86/intel/domain: Add new domain type for die kan.liang
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf/x86/intel/cstate: Support die scope counters on CLX-AP kan.liang
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf/x86/intel/uncore: " kan.liang
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf/x86/intel/rapl: " kan.liang
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf header: Add die information in cpu topology kan.liang
2019-02-19 20:00 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf stat: Support per-die aggregation kan.liang
2019-02-20 10:15 ` [PATCH 00/10] perf: Multi-die/package support Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20 12:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-02-20 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20 13:32 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190220111226.GG32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.