From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
To: Chris Tracy <ctracy@engr.scu.edu>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux NFS v4.1 server support for dynamic slot allocation?
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:10:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190220171027.GA4399@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902181301001.4186@unimatrix3.engr.scu.edu>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 01:46:24PM -0800, Chris Tracy wrote:
> Hopefully I'm not missing something obvious, but I'm curious
> whatever happened to the patch series from late 2012 that added
> dynamic v4.1 session slot allocation support to nfsd:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg34390.html
>
> The corresponding nfs client patches were integrated, but the nfsd
> series seems to have been left out due to release timing:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg34505.html
>
> However, they don't seem to ever have been integrated or discussed
> again. Were there other issues that prevented its inclusion in the
> intervening time?
They'd probably need reworking. The latest discussion I can find is:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/CAABAsM6vDOaudUZYWH23oGiWGqX5Bd1YbCDnL6L=pxzMXgZzaw@mail.gmail.com/
> Alternatively, is there some admin-tweakable knob for controlling
> the number of slots available per-session on the NFS v4.1 server
> (nfsd.ko), similar to the 'max_session_slots' client-side parameter
> for nfs.ko?
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/fs/nfs?id=ef159e9177cc5a09e6174796dde0b2d243ddf28b
>
> I ask because I'm currently standing up a (very) modest HPC cluster
> PoC (1 server, 8 client nodes, all 10Gbit, all running CentOS 7.6)
> and figured that was a good enough excuse to finally move away from
> NFS v3 and investigate NFS v4.x. However, initial performance
> testing showed that while NFS v4.0 was essentially identical to v3,
> NFS v4.2 (and v4.1) were around 25% slower.
>
> Looking at the traffic in wireshark, I see that in CREATE_SESSION,
> the client sets ca_maxrequests to 64 (consistent with the value of
> 'max_session_slots') but the server always replies with a value of
> 10 for ca_maxreqests. This seems to be the source of the
> performance issue, since if I fallback to v4.0 or v3, but set nfsd
> to use only 10 threads in nfs.conf, I get roughly equivalent
> performance to v4.2.
>
> Looking at the code (both in CentOS's 3.10.0-957.5.1.el7.x86_64 and
> in the 4.20.8 mainline), it seems the value that would need to
> change is the preprocessor define NFSD_CACHE_SIZE_SLOTS_PER_SESSION.
> This is fixed at 32, and while it's a bit more complex than this,
> the code in nfs4_get_drc_mem (fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c) basically sets
> the per-client session slot limit to '(int)(32/3)' which is where
> the '10' comes from.
Thanks for the report!
I think the limit should only be that low if the client requests very
large slots. Do your clients have 35c036ef4a72 "nfs: RPC_MAX_AUTH_SIZE
is in bytes" applied?
> Is there something else I've missed somewhere that allows adjusting
> the server-side session slot limit to be more than 10 without having
> to compile a custom version of nfsd.ko?
No. It might be a good idea, though really I think your setup should
just work out of the box.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-20 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-18 21:46 Linux NFS v4.1 server support for dynamic slot allocation? Chris Tracy
2019-02-20 17:10 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2019-02-20 19:07 ` Chris Tracy
2019-02-21 16:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-02-27 20:48 ` Chris Tracy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190220171027.GA4399@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=ctracy@engr.scu.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.