From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
hemantg@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Update baudrate change wait time for wcn3990
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:43:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190220234302.GB116191@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190220112516.19179-1-bgodavar@codeaurora.org>
Hi Balakrishna,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 04:55:16PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
> This patch will update the baudrate change request wait time from
> 300 ms to 100 ms. When host sends the change baudrate request to
> the controller, controller sets its clock and wait until the
> clocks settle down. Here the Wait time is required for both
> host and controller to be on sync.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> index 5e03504c4e0c..22f3c983f868 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@
>
> #define IBS_WAKE_RETRANS_TIMEOUT_MS 100
> #define IBS_TX_IDLE_TIMEOUT_MS 2000
> -#define BAUDRATE_SETTLE_TIMEOUT_MS 300
> +#define ROME_BD_SETTLE_TIMEOUT_MS 300
> +#define WCN3990_BD_SETTLE_TIMEOUT_MS 100
nit: _BR_ instead of _BD_?
> #define POWER_PULSE_TRANS_TIMEOUT_MS 100
>
> /* susclk rate */
> @@ -965,8 +966,11 @@ static int qca_set_baudrate(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t baudrate)
> struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
> struct qca_data *qca = hu->priv;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> + struct qca_serdev *qcadev;
> + unsigned int bd_settling_timeout;
nit: from the context the purpose of the variable is fairly clear,
calling it just 'timeout' (or 'settling_time', it's not really a
timeout) should be fine.
That said, I have a similar change in my pipeline, which further
reduces the time to the 'strictly necessary'. It's slightly more code
though. I guess I'll send it and we can discuss/let Marcel decide
what to adopt.
Cheers
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-20 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-20 11:25 [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Update baudrate change wait time for wcn3990 Balakrishna Godavarthi
2019-02-20 23:43 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2019-02-25 23:56 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190220234302.GB116191@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=bgodavar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hemantg@codeaurora.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.