From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from v1.tansi.org (mail.tansi.org [84.19.178.47]) by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:21:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from gatewagner.dyndns.org (unknown [81.6.44.245]) by v1.tansi.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D23A9140051 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:20:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:21:08 +0100 From: Arno Wagner Message-ID: <20190221172108.GA23405@tansi.org> References: <39009205-57b3-b009-d256-0c1db64e9d80@linux.ibm.com> <39388d6e-cd13-0dc8-dd5a-f0bbc933bda8@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Filesystem corruption with LVM's pvmove onto an encrypted volume with LUKS2 and a sector size of 4096 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 16:45:43 CET, Ingo Franzki wrote: > I now understand the technical reasons for the behavior, but I still think > that this can't be 'works as designed'. You can easily destroy the > filesystem and thus loose all your data on your logical volume, without a > chance to notice upfront! For that let me refer you to FAQ Item 6.1 If you lose all your data, the problem is somewhere else. In particular you should _never_ move partitions around without backup. Regards, Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: arno@wagner.name GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718 ---- A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of "news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier