From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 22 Feb 2019 15:53:26 -0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx1.suse.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gxD8e-0006es-3j for speck@linutronix.de; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:53:24 +0100 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A454AF76 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:53:09 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: [MODERATED] Re: Re: [patch V3 9/9] MDS basics 9 Message-ID: <20190222155309.GE30865@zn.tnic> References: <20190221234431.922117624@linutronix.de> <20190221235535.207933985@linutronix.de> <20190222075040.GA25676@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:38:36AM +0100, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > The internal state is there so the dmesg/sysfs output reflects the > protection state real vs. lottery. MDS_MITIGATION_LOTTERY is starting to sound ok too, all of a sudden. :-P --=20 Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HR= B 21284 (AG N=C3=BCrnberg) --=20