From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41617) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxwqq-0005Td-3O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:42:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxwqp-0008ME-Ef for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:42:04 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:36873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxwqp-0008Lj-8h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:42:03 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id x10so5896419wmg.2 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 08:42:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:41:58 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20190224114135-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20190221173326.31874-1-mst@redhat.com> <20190222105159-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20190223193335-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/26] pci, pc, virtio: fixes, cleanups, tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , David Gibson On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 10:21:52AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 00:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Peter, can you merge for_upstream now pls? Don't want to spam > > the list with a trivial change like that ... > > Yes, it's on my list, but so are seven other pullreqs; > seems like everybody likes to submit on a Friday, so > sending on a Friday guarantees maximum delay because > you'll be in a big queue with other people and I don't > generally handle pullreqs on the weekend either... OK I'll try to switch over to middle of the week. > In general I prefer it if you just re-send the cover-letter > email as a v2 rather than informally asking for a retry: that > guarantees I'll see it and automatically makes it appear > in my list of things to process. You don't need to > resend all the individual patchmails if the change was > minor. > > thanks > -- PMM Good to know. -- MST