All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: allocate sector sized IO buffer via page_frag_alloc
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:26:30 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190225202630.GG23020@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ad2ef83-8b3a-0a15-d72e-72652b807aad@suse.cz>

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 02:15:59PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 2/25/19 5:36 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:09:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> XFS uses kmalloc() to allocate sector sized IO buffer.
> > ....
> >> Use page_frag_alloc() to allocate the sector sized buffer, then the
> >> above issue can be fixed because offset_in_page of allocated buffer
> >> is always sector aligned.
> > 
> > Didn't we already reject this approach because page frags cannot be
> > reused and that pages allocated to the frag pool are pinned in
> > memory until all fragments allocated on the page have been freed?
> 
> I don't know if you did, but it's certainly true., Also I don't think
> there's any specified alignment guarantee for page_frag_alloc().

We did, and the alignment guarantee would have come from all
fragments having an aligned size.

> What about kmem_cache_create() with align parameter? That *should* be
> guaranteed regardless of whatever debugging is enabled - if not, I would
> consider it a bug.

Yup, that's pretty much what was decided. The sticking point was
whether is should be block layer infrastructure (because the actual
memory buffer alignment is a block/device driver requirement not
visible to the filesystem) or whether "sector size alignement is
good enough for everyone".

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-25 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-25  4:09 [PATCH] xfs: allocate sector sized IO buffer via page_frag_alloc Ming Lei
2019-02-25  4:36 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-25  8:46   ` Ming Lei
2019-02-25 10:03     ` Ming Lei
2019-02-25 20:11     ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-25 13:15   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-02-25 20:26     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-02-26  2:22       ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26  3:02         ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-26  3:27           ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-26  4:58             ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-26  9:33               ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 10:06                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-02-26 10:06                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-02-26 11:12                   ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 12:12                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-26 12:35                       ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 13:02                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-26 13:42                           ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 14:04                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-26 16:14                               ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-26 16:19                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-27  1:41                                   ` Ming Lei
2019-02-27  7:07                                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-03-08  8:18                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-27 21:38                                 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-26 15:30                             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-26 20:45                 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-27  1:50                   ` Ming Lei
2019-02-27  3:41                     ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-26 15:20     ` Christopher Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190225202630.GG23020@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.