All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] objtool: Add UACCESS validation
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:40:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228094008.GN32534@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190227172816.GT32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:28:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:33 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > > Urgh, kasan_report() is definitely unsafe. Now, admitedly we should
> > > 'never' hit that, but it does leave us up a creek without a paddle.
> 
> > If SMAP detects additional bugs, then it would be pity to disable it
> > with KASAN (detect bugs in production but not during testing).
> > 
> > You mentioned that exception save/restore the UACCESS state. Is it
> > possible to do the same in kasan_report? At the very least we need to
> > survive report printing, what happens after that does not matter much
> > (we've corrupted memory by now anyway).
> 
> Ideally we'll put all of kasan_report() in an exception, much like we do
> for WARN. But there's a distinct lack of arch hooks there to play with.
> I suppose I can try and create some.
> 
> On top of that we'll have to mark these __asan functions with notrace.
> 
> Maybe a little something horrible like so... completely untested.

OK, I got that to compile; the next problem is:

../include/linux/kasan.h:90:1: error: built-in function ‘__asan_loadN_noabort’ must be directly called
UACCESS_SAFE(__asan_loadN_noabort);

Which doesn't make any sense; since we actually generated that symbol,
it clearly is not built-in. What gives?



  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-28  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-25 12:43 [PATCH 0/6] objtool: UACCESS validation Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/uaccess: Dont evaluate argument inside AC region Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 15:43   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 16:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:36     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-25 16:50       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 19:09     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-25 19:18       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-25 18:10   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 19:46   ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/ia32: Fix ia32_restore_sigcontext AC leak Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 15:41   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 16:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:29       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 16:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:49           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] objtool: Set insn->func for alternatives Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] objtool: Replace STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD annotation Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:11   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-02-25 16:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:23       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-02-27 12:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-28  0:30       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] objtool: Add UACCESS validation Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 15:53   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 16:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 17:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 17:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-25 17:38         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-02-27 14:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 14:17     ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-02-27 14:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 14:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 15:40           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-27 17:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-28  9:40               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-02-28  9:59                 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-28 10:05                   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-28 10:52                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 16:18     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-27 17:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 17:36         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] objtool: Add Direction Flag validation Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190228094008.GN32534@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.