From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 2002:a05:6000:188:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id p8csp792592wrx; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 08:08:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwVRFkFiJneeO2HOuaD1mMBE9zoupvW0XOT4TexM5b78XqIa3wBiQgvCWzCxaW07UDj6D2P X-Received: by 2002:a81:9958:: with SMTP id q85mr4270998ywg.390.1551456528671; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 08:08:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551456528; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i1LJgGRzLOV6KoKqG9khHahXV90JyMnA2cWjWbRXSBOklDIdWuB7xeX6UZBNrxwWkP 3XhkMX57iLC/t/KHo9coKwFvjbAVI5eDfF/IwFGnYyqt73ZZyEoEH3P9MuOb05OtRmS2 hHlZ33eFLk+iGWTh7jouLxyneTS/Xx8ap03UUpBHJ9vA9pmHzVPsQfsFnhy7APP/8I5j lBtinIT/gbNBJ3xAmklfYfU/vIMQuDf9Oj5RExWXolsUHOXxF5Yj9Jg53zyAnxyaydi4 Y6TAH6zbEA7CTpTeObiONBQiXXfvyCoToaN0o5J5yEQWluP9mn/M8Qc+GVwV4YQYzjUt jgoQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:cc:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:subject :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:to:from:date; bh=G3Blk06kaszH9FLclkpv4vCJEanatzyo60wRKT0VabM=; b=xT5tfsx52WHG/RarXudrnN+qHHWzaL6wVIcnJxnuiZIm7vqIwGu3q25KdZJ8Wu4eMV e1adlJyd9rZkkzc23d8FLOkW51vrQUr0PSOJ0siMpxzmV7Q2Aw3h+B/N6XuPdhaLMC+t ymWUNuTn74jY8YS3kcnPQ1k3NQJLX3dkvEJ7VcsCqHgpCHC35pzF3NoLFUclelMwG4V9 K+FOU2AdrCtFBQlMqHHmoBhKKUG8irks3SXDuxCqH1nCX6FyYUkg/eJOKOvDgpjJfhPs t1Msxq6SXeBHJTR+7UxlrslgMJJSaWthPogC+NUAiJbk1KIVp5bEtQvxfsnLyf1YCgm9 mLcg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [209.51.188.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f205si10501729ywf.334.2019.03.01.08.08.48 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Mar 2019 08:08:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39891 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzkiO-0005k8-3a for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:08:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzkg0-00044k-Gw for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:06:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzkfu-0000nt-S2 for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:06:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzkfu-0000mb-76; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:06:14 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B6D03088D82; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.43.2.182]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3B819C69; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:06:05 +0100 From: Igor Mammedov To: Eric Auger Message-ID: <20190301170605.55e5abdb@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190301134709.4695-11-eric.auger@redhat.com> References: <20190301134709.4695-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190301134709.4695-11-eric.auger@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.42]); Fri, 01 Mar 2019 16:06:13 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 10/10] hw/arm/virt: Bump the 255GB initial RAM limit X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, eric.auger.pro@gmail.com Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-arm" X-TUID: cwEJb23zzByz On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 14:47:09 +0100 Eric Auger wrote: > Now we have the extended memory map (high IO regions beyond the > scalable RAM) and dynamic IPA range support at KVM/ARM level > we can bump the legacy 255GB initial RAM limit. The actual maximum > RAM size now depends on the physical CPU and host kernel, in > accelerated mode. In TCG mode, it depends on the VCPU > AA64MMFR0.PARANGE. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov > > --- > v7 -> v8: > - TCG PAMAX check moved in a separate patch > > v6 -> v7 > - handle TCG case > - set_memmap modifications moved to previous patches > --- > hw/arm/virt.c | 21 +-------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c > index ab70e4a657..aa06570050 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/virt.c > +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c > @@ -95,20 +95,7 @@ > > #define PLATFORM_BUS_NUM_IRQS 64 > > -/* RAM limit in GB. Since VIRT_MEM starts at the 1GB mark, this means > - * RAM can go up to the 256GB mark, leaving 256GB of the physical > - * address space unallocated and free for future use between 256G and 512G. > - * If we need to provide more RAM to VMs in the future then we need to: > - * * allocate a second bank of RAM starting at 2TB and working up > - * * fix the DT and ACPI table generation code in QEMU to correctly > - * report two split lumps of RAM to the guest > - * * fix KVM in the host kernel to allow guests with >40 bit address spaces > - * (We don't want to fill all the way up to 512GB with RAM because > - * we might want it for non-RAM purposes later. Conversely it seems > - * reasonable to assume that anybody configuring a VM with a quarter > - * of a terabyte of RAM will be doing it on a host with more than a > - * terabyte of physical address space.) > - */ > +/* Legacy RAM limit in GB (< version 4.0) */ > #define LEGACY_RAMLIMIT_GB 255 > #define LEGACY_RAMLIMIT_BYTES (LEGACY_RAMLIMIT_GB * GiB) > > @@ -1516,12 +1503,6 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) > > vms->smp_cpus = smp_cpus; > > - if (machine->ram_size > vms->memmap[VIRT_MEM].size) { > - error_report("mach-virt: cannot model more than %dGB RAM", > - LEGACY_RAMLIMIT_GB); > - exit(1); > - } > - > if (vms->virt && kvm_enabled()) { > error_report("mach-virt: KVM does not support providing " > "Virtualization extensions to the guest CPU"); From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56503) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzkg6-00046e-Cr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:06:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzkg5-0000wd-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:06:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:06:05 +0100 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20190301170605.55e5abdb@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190301134709.4695-11-eric.auger@redhat.com> References: <20190301134709.4695-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190301134709.4695-11-eric.auger@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 10/10] hw/arm/virt: Bump the 255GB initial RAM limit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Auger Cc: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, david@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 14:47:09 +0100 Eric Auger wrote: > Now we have the extended memory map (high IO regions beyond the > scalable RAM) and dynamic IPA range support at KVM/ARM level > we can bump the legacy 255GB initial RAM limit. The actual maximum > RAM size now depends on the physical CPU and host kernel, in > accelerated mode. In TCG mode, it depends on the VCPU > AA64MMFR0.PARANGE. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov > > --- > v7 -> v8: > - TCG PAMAX check moved in a separate patch > > v6 -> v7 > - handle TCG case > - set_memmap modifications moved to previous patches > --- > hw/arm/virt.c | 21 +-------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c > index ab70e4a657..aa06570050 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/virt.c > +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c > @@ -95,20 +95,7 @@ > > #define PLATFORM_BUS_NUM_IRQS 64 > > -/* RAM limit in GB. Since VIRT_MEM starts at the 1GB mark, this means > - * RAM can go up to the 256GB mark, leaving 256GB of the physical > - * address space unallocated and free for future use between 256G and 512G. > - * If we need to provide more RAM to VMs in the future then we need to: > - * * allocate a second bank of RAM starting at 2TB and working up > - * * fix the DT and ACPI table generation code in QEMU to correctly > - * report two split lumps of RAM to the guest > - * * fix KVM in the host kernel to allow guests with >40 bit address spaces > - * (We don't want to fill all the way up to 512GB with RAM because > - * we might want it for non-RAM purposes later. Conversely it seems > - * reasonable to assume that anybody configuring a VM with a quarter > - * of a terabyte of RAM will be doing it on a host with more than a > - * terabyte of physical address space.) > - */ > +/* Legacy RAM limit in GB (< version 4.0) */ > #define LEGACY_RAMLIMIT_GB 255 > #define LEGACY_RAMLIMIT_BYTES (LEGACY_RAMLIMIT_GB * GiB) > > @@ -1516,12 +1503,6 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) > > vms->smp_cpus = smp_cpus; > > - if (machine->ram_size > vms->memmap[VIRT_MEM].size) { > - error_report("mach-virt: cannot model more than %dGB RAM", > - LEGACY_RAMLIMIT_GB); > - exit(1); > - } > - > if (vms->virt && kvm_enabled()) { > error_report("mach-virt: KVM does not support providing " > "Virtualization extensions to the guest CPU");