From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 04 Mar 2019 07:32:00 -0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1h0i4s-0003Fa-6A for speck@linutronix.de; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:31:58 +0100 Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 08:31:48 +0100 From: Greg KH Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] 2 Message-ID: <20190304073148.GB23573@kroah.com> References: <20190304012138.gikabpafseh2swre@treble> <20190304012415.cyjcrfc26ap4c45y@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190304012415.cyjcrfc26ap4c45y@treble> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 07:24:15PM -0600, speck for Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > From: Josh Poimboeuf > Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/4] x86/speculation: Move arch_smt_update() call to after > mitigation decisions > > arch_smt_update() now has a dependency on both Spectre v2 and MDS > mitigations. Move its initial call to after all the mitigation > decisions have been made. So Patch 1 doesn't work without this? If so, shouldn't this go first? thanks, greg k-h