From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: "Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martijn Coenen" <maco@google.com>,
"Android Kernel Team" <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binder: fix race between munmap() and direct reclaim
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 14:35:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190305193507.GA149288@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHRSSExy=kWt+MDzD10VogfasygJET6FmEtRc9vJuLv4Ov7+uA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 08:27:44AM -0800, Todd Kjos wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 11:57 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 03:06:06PM -0800, Todd Kjos wrote:
> > > An munmap() on a binder device causes binder_vma_close() to be called
> > > which clears the alloc->vma pointer.
> > >
> > > If direct reclaim causes binder_alloc_free_page() to be called, there
> > > is a race where alloc->vma is read into a local vma pointer and then
> > > used later after the mm->mmap_sem is acquired. This can result in
> > > calling zap_page_range() with an invalid vma which manifests as a
> > > use-after-free in zap_page_range().
> > >
> > > The fix is to check alloc->vma after acquiring the mmap_sem (which we
> > > were acquiring anyway) and skip zap_page_range() if it has changed
> > > to NULL.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Awesome patch,
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
thanks!
- Joel
> > > ---
> >
> > Any specific commit that this fixes?
>
> No, it's been there a long time.
>
> > And should it be marked for stable releases?
>
> It is needed in stable (back to 4.4), but will need to be backported.
> Should I post backported versions targeting the specific releases now?
> I was thinking we'd wait for this one to land. I think we'll need 1
> patch for 4.4/4.9 and a second one for 4.14/4.19 (and some of those
> backported patches will have conflicts when merged down to android-4.X
> -- I think the 4.14/4.19 version will apply to all the android
> branches). Let me know how you want to handle this.
>
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-05 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-01 23:06 [PATCH] binder: fix race between munmap() and direct reclaim Todd Kjos
2019-03-02 7:57 ` Greg KH
2019-03-02 16:27 ` Todd Kjos
2019-03-05 19:35 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190305193507.GA149288@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.