From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/gart/kcore: Exclude GART aperture from kcore
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 17:03:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190306090307.GG14858@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACPcB9e5+-3TrZ-nQc37-0nayU0RSMo-T4V+h4nEaHJ8Mqryqw@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/06/19 at 04:48pm, Kairui Song wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 4:00 PM Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Baoquan, after second thought, vmcore and kcore are doing similar
> thing but still quite independent of each, didn't see any simple way
> to share the logic.
> And for the following naming issue I think considering the context
> there is no problem, "exclude_from_vmcore(aper_alloc, aper_order)" is
> clearly doing what it literally means, excluding the aperture from
> vmcore.
>
> Let me know if anything is wrong, will send V4 later reuse this approach.
Thanks for the effort.
Yes, saw your v3. I kept quiet because I personally prefer the v2 method
which is similar to vmcore handling. So if you have investigated and
decided to do v2 way after deliberate thought, feel free to post v4. I
will make time to review.
Thanks
Baoquan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-06 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-02 10:54 [PATCH v2] x86/gart/kcore: Exclude GART aperture from kcore Kairui Song
2019-01-23 14:14 ` Baoquan He
2019-01-23 14:50 ` Kairui Song
2019-01-24 2:17 ` Baoquan He
2019-02-19 8:00 ` Kairui Song
2019-03-06 8:48 ` Kairui Song
2019-03-06 9:03 ` Baoquan He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190306090307.GG14858@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=kasong@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.