From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Cc: bcrl@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-aio@kvack.org, houtao1@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix syzkaller task hung in exit_aio
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:44:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190306194455.GV2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1551880403-132638-1-git-send-email-zhengbin13@huawei.com>
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 09:53:23PM +0800, zhengbin wrote:
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> aio_poll-->vfs_poll
> eventfd_write-->spin_lock_irq(lock)
> -->..-->aio_poll_wake
> -->spin_unlock_irq(lock)
> -->spin_lock(lock)
> -->if (req->woken)
> mask = 0; --->did not call aio_poll_complete
> -->iocb_put
>
> aio_poll_wake
> req->woken = true;
> if (mask) {
> if (!(mask & req->events))
> return 0; --->did not call aio_poll_complete too
... and it's still on waitqueue, so it shouldn't be different from
_not_ having had a wakeup yet. And yes, aio_poll() in mainline right
now ends up _not_ adding it to "can be cancelled" list, leading to
that bug.
> vfs_poll-->eventfd_poll-->poll_wait-->aio_poll_queue_proc(add
> aio_poll_wake to req->head)
>
> eventfd_write-->wake_up_locked_poll-->__wake_up_common-->curr->func
> -->aio_poll_wake
>
> This patch fixes that. by the way, fix the bug of the error handling path.
Leak on error is real (see thread a few days ago), and overall logics for
"woken" should be similar to what you suggest, but I'd rather handle it
slightly differently (see the same thread).
I've a patch that ought to fix that and it seems to survive testing; I'll
post once I finish carving it up - too many cleanups mixed into it. Give
me a couple of hours; should be done (and posted) by then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-06 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 13:53 [PATCH] fix syzkaller task hung in exit_aio zhengbin
2019-03-06 19:44 ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-03-07 0:07 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190306194455.GV2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengbin13@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.