All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Is MPOL_F_MOF user visible?
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 12:49:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190309124924.GM9565@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f1f8f38-71fa-7a12-92cd-c3ad552518ff@linux.alibaba.com>

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:22:59PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> 
> When reading the mempolicy code, I got confused by MPOL_F_MOF flag. It is
> defined in include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h, so it looks visible to the users.
> But, man page doesn't mention it at all. And, the code in do_set_mempolicy()
> -> mpol_new() doesn't set it. It looks it is just set by two places:
> 
>     - NUMA default policy (preferred_node_policy)
> 
>     - When MPOL_MF_LAZY is passed in. But, it is not configurable from user
> since it is not valid MF
> 

It was never exported to userspace because it was not clear how the
policy would be used sensibly outside the context of the default policy.

> So, actually it can't be set by user with set_mempolicy()/mbind() APIs,
> right? As long as the process' or vmas' policy is changed to non-default one
> (i.e. MPOL_BIND), those processes or vmas are *not* eligible for migrating
> with NUMA balancing anymore?
> 

Correct because if the policy is MPOL_BIND, it's not defined how lazy
migration should behave.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs


      reply	other threads:[~2019-03-09 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-09  6:22 [QUESTION] Is MPOL_F_MOF user visible? Yang Shi
2019-03-09 12:49 ` Mel Gorman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190309124924.GM9565@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.