From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: chenjie6@huawei.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, zengweilin@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex:fix robust futex alignment exception
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:41:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190315084131.GS5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552621478-119787-1-git-send-email-chenjie6@huawei.com>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 03:44:38AM +0000, chenjie6@huawei.com wrote:
> From: chen jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
> [11542.215247] [<c017b1d4>] (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked) from [<c017da50>] (handle_futex_death+0x78/0xcc)
> [11542.215259] [<c017da50>] (handle_futex_death) from [<c017dba8>] (exit_robust_list+0x104/0x160)
> [11542.215273] [<c017dba8>] (exit_robust_list) from [<c011b40c>] (mm_release+0x1c/0x108)
> [11542.215287] [<c011b40c>] (mm_release) from [<c011f9a4>] (do_exit+0x218/0x9a4)
> [11542.215299] [<c011f9a4>] (do_exit) from [<c0120250>] (do_group_exit+0xac/0xf4)
> [11542.215311] [<c0120250>] (do_group_exit) from [<c01202a8>] (__wake_up_parent+0x0/0x18)
> Signed-off-by: chen jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
However, should there not also be alignment tests on set_robust_list()?
Also; do_futex() should probably check uaddr and uaddr2.
That is; why aren't there any alignment tests anywhere? Or am I just
gone blind?
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index a0514e0..70231c4 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -3440,6 +3440,9 @@ static int handle_futex_death(u32 __user *uaddr, struct task_struct *curr, int p
> {
> u32 uval, uninitialized_var(nval), mval;
>
> + if (((unsigned long)uaddr & 0x3) > 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> retry:
> if (get_user(uval, uaddr))
> return -1;
> --
> 1.8.3.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-15 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-15 3:44 [PATCH] futex:fix robust futex alignment exception chenjie6
2019-03-15 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-03-17 14:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-18 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18 11:35 ` Chenjie (K)
2019-03-22 12:10 ` [tip:locking/urgent] futex: Ensure that futex address is aligned in handle_futex_death() tip-bot for Chen Jie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190315084131.GS5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chenjie6@huawei.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zengweilin@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.