All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martynas Pumputis <m@lambda.lt>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	mhocko@suse.com, m@lambda.lt, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf] bpf: Try harder when allocating memory for large maps
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:10:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190318151026.21539-1-m@lambda.lt> (raw)

It has been observed that sometimes a higher order memory allocation
for BPF maps fails when there is no obvious memory pressure in a system.

E.g. the map (BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH, key=38, value=56, max_elems=524288)
could not be created due to vmalloc unable to allocate 75497472B,
when the system's memory consumption (in MB) was the following:

    Total: 3942 Used: 837 (21.24%) Free: 138 Buffers: 239 Cached: 2727

Later analysis [1] by Michal Hocko showed that the vmalloc was not trying
to reclaim memory from the page cache and was failing prematurely due to
__GFP_NORETRY.

Considering dcda9b0471 ("mm, tree wide: replace __GFP_REPEAT by
__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with more useful semantic") and [1], we can replace
__GFP_NORETRY with __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, as it won't invoke OOM killer
and will try harder to fulfil allocation requests.

Unfortunately, replacing the body of the BPF map memory allocation
function with the kvmalloc_node helper function is not an option at this
point in time, given 1) kmalloc is non-optional for higher order
allocations, and 2) passing __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL to the kmalloc would stress
the slab allocator too much for large requests.

The change has been tested with the workloads mentioned above and by
observing oom_kill value from /proc/vmstat.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20190310071318.GW5232@dhcp22.suse.cz/

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis <m@lambda.lt>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 62f6bced3a3c..afca36f53c49 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -136,21 +136,29 @@ static struct bpf_map *find_and_alloc_map(union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 void *bpf_map_area_alloc(size_t size, int numa_node)
 {
-	/* We definitely need __GFP_NORETRY, so OOM killer doesn't
-	 * trigger under memory pressure as we really just want to
-	 * fail instead.
+	/* We really just want to fail instead of triggering OOM killer
+	 * under memory pressure, therefore we set __GFP_NORETRY to kmalloc,
+	 * which is used for lower order allocation requests.
+	 *
+	 * It has been observed that higher order allocation requests done by
+	 * vmalloc with __GFP_NORETRY being set might fail due to not trying
+	 * to reclaim memory from the page cache, thus we set
+	 * __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL to avoid such situations.
 	 */
-	const gfp_t flags = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_ZERO;
+
+	const gfp_t flags = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO;
 	void *area;
 
 	if (size <= (PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)) {
-		area = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_USER | flags, numa_node);
+		area = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NORETRY | flags,
+				    numa_node);
 		if (area != NULL)
 			return area;
 	}
 
-	return __vmalloc_node_flags_caller(size, numa_node, GFP_KERNEL | flags,
-					   __builtin_return_address(0));
+	return __vmalloc_node_flags_caller(size, numa_node,
+					   GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
+					   flags, __builtin_return_address(0));
 }
 
 void bpf_map_area_free(void *area)
-- 
2.21.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-18 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-18 15:10 Martynas Pumputis [this message]
2019-03-18 15:39 ` [PATCH v3 bpf] bpf: Try harder when allocating memory for large maps Michal Hocko
2019-03-18 15:52   ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190318151026.21539-1-m@lambda.lt \
    --to=m@lambda.lt \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.