From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@umn.edu>
Cc: kjlu@umn.edu, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udf: Fix to check the return value of load_nls
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:52:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190319085259.GD17334@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319025950.18311-1-pakki001@umn.edu>
On Mon 18-03-19 21:59:49, Aditya Pakki wrote:
> load_nls may fail and return an error message. The patch checks
> for such a scenario and passes the error upstream.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@umn.edu>
Thanks for the patch! But there's other code handling nls_map in
udf_fill_super() which takes care about this situation:
if ((uopt.flags & (1 << UDF_FLAG_NLS_MAP)) && !uopt.nls_map) {
uopt.nls_map = load_nls_default();
if (!uopt.nls_map)
uopt.flags &= ~(1 << UDF_FLAG_NLS_MAP);
else
udf_debug("Using default NLS map\n");
}
So if we failed to load nls map admin originally requested, we fall back to
a default nls map or just don't load anything. It is questionable whether
we shouldn't fail mount rather than trying to continue with a different nls
map but at this point I don't see a strong reason to change the current
behavior users can depend on...
I've added a comment to udf_parse_options() to explain the code flow.
Honza
> ---
> fs/udf/super.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
> index ffd8038ff728..1a38271de6d9 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/super.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/super.c
> @@ -573,6 +573,8 @@ static int udf_parse_options(char *options, struct udf_options *uopt,
> if (uopt->nls_map)
> unload_nls(uopt->nls_map);
> uopt->nls_map = load_nls(args[0].from);
> + if (!uopt->nls_map)
> + return 0;
> uopt->flags |= (1 << UDF_FLAG_NLS_MAP);
> }
> break;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-19 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-19 2:59 [PATCH] udf: Fix to check the return value of load_nls Aditya Pakki
2019-03-19 8:52 ` Jan Kara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190319085259.GD17334@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pakki001@umn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.