From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>, Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [spi:for-5.2 11/19] drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c:483:5: sparse: symbol 'fsl_lpspi_runtime_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:46:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201903190907.mIc3klXH%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-5.2
head: 69b921acae8a5b7feef03921d9b42c3634f3b9d1
commit: 944c01a889d97dc08e1b71f4ed868f4023fd6034 [11/19] spi: lpspi: enable runtime pm for lpspi
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 944c01a889d97dc08e1b71f4ed868f4023fd6034
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c:483:5: sparse: symbol 'fsl_lpspi_runtime_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c:501:5: sparse: symbol 'fsl_lpspi_runtime_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-19 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-19 1:46 kbuild test robot [this message]
2019-03-19 1:46 ` [RFC PATCH spi] spi: lpspi: fsl_lpspi_runtime_resume() can be static kbuild test robot
2019-03-19 13:14 ` Applied "spi: lpspi: fsl_lpspi_runtime_resume() can be static" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2019-03-19 13:14 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201903190907.mIc3klXH%lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.