All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC 4/8] cmd: bootefi: move do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec() forward
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:16:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322021634.GN9937@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92c0ca2c-cd99-9790-b6d2-42c3095b3dd6@gmx.de>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:48:53PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 3/5/19 6:53 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > This is a preparatory patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  cmd/bootefi.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/cmd/bootefi.c b/cmd/bootefi.c
> > index 3619a20e6433..1d90e7b4b575 100644
> > --- a/cmd/bootefi.c
> > +++ b/cmd/bootefi.c
> > @@ -314,6 +314,27 @@ err_add_protocol:
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct efi_device_path *device_path, *file_path;
> > +	void *addr;
> > +	efi_status_t r;
> > +
> > +	addr = efi_bootmgr_load(&device_path, &file_path);
> > +	if (!addr)
> > +		return 1;
> > +
> > +	printf("## Starting EFI application at %p ...\n", addr);
> > +	r = do_bootefi_exec(addr, device_path, file_path);
> > +	printf("## Application terminated, r = %lu\n",
> > +	       r & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > +	if (r != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > +		return 1;
> 
> return CMD_RET_FAILURE ?
> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> 
> return CMD_RET_SUCCESS ?
> 
> The lines following efi_bootmgr_load() are duplicating code from
> do_bootefi().

do_bootefi() -> do_boot_efi()?

> The patch itself is ok. But in the patch series we should get rid of the
> duplication.

We only share:
> > +	printf("## Starting EFI application at %p ...\n", addr);
> > +	r = do_bootefi_exec(addr, device_path, file_path);
> > +	printf("## Application terminated, r = %lu\n",
> > +	       r & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > +	if (r != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > +		return 1;

Can we call it a duplication?
# I don't like the print messages here anyway.

-Takahiro Akashi

> Best regards
> 
> Heinrich
> 
> > +}
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST
> >  /**
> >   * bootefi_test_prepare() - prepare to run an EFI test
> > @@ -362,27 +383,6 @@ failure:
> >
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST */
> >
> > -static int do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec(void)
> > -{
> > -	struct efi_device_path *device_path, *file_path;
> > -	void *addr;
> > -	efi_status_t r;
> > -
> > -	addr = efi_bootmgr_load(&device_path, &file_path);
> > -	if (!addr)
> > -		return 1;
> > -
> > -	printf("## Starting EFI application at %p ...\n", addr);
> > -	r = do_bootefi_exec(addr, device_path, file_path);
> > -	printf("## Application terminated, r = %lu\n",
> > -	       r & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > -
> > -	if (r != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > -		return 1;
> > -
> > -	return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> >  /* Interpreter command to boot an arbitrary EFI image from memory */
> >  static int do_bootefi(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
> >  {
> >
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-22  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-05  5:53 [U-Boot] [RFC 0/8] efi_loader: rework bootefi/bootmgr AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 1/8] efi_loader: boottime: don't add device path protocol to image handle AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05 19:48   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-06  0:27     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-06  5:04       ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-06  5:29         ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-27  2:50           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 2/8] efi_loader: boottime: export efi_[un]load_image() AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05 20:02   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 3/8] efi_loader: bootmgr: return pointer and size of buffer in loading AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-21 11:41   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-22  2:08     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 4/8] cmd: bootefi: move do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec() forward AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-21 11:48   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-22  2:16     ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 5/8] cmd: bootefi: carve out fdt handling AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 6/8] cmd: bootefi: carve out efi_selftest code from do_bootefi() AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 7/8] cmd: bootefi: rework do_bootefi(), using load_image API AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 8/8] cmd: add efibootmgr command AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-19  7:23 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 0/8] efi_loader: rework bootefi/bootmgr AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-21  6:41   ` Heinrich Schuchardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190322021634.GN9937@linaro.org \
    --to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.