From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com (mail-wr1-f66.google.com [209.85.221.66]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338CB7D08E for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id r4so11114850wrq.8 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:20:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Q8lG4bGayt5xW1wu90xkKFa8ZDAz9QKPz6tv1zzdZb8=; b=Kdham2tc11/74QMilAs46BCT2fGLHjRqK0QJiK1jhGg96ryQqCj93X7byWyHE+KaBH VuxihvrEsBKuYY7xHgVnPsytVi1iC/HkFvyBEYucucePyt2WHIZSuOyuQc7KTIBkcz2u PB+R/i2yqcW9GmwOLIhSxUtel058PE/lTsqh/eHbdBT9Yj/UkxKTJXSP3Aomhu5sFDvw kZkNob8k5jVq+9fYS09vMXQ/wmQKudrgZ4ORjmB0GAUXcg3xc1d+7Bp8ymvCMirfl0l1 X31J0r9IvTQJvpisDYJVUq36BkUxB8SjsGRbjHFlTNdvwKUsXcA4XImzAkpqlvW71GgK RGQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Q8lG4bGayt5xW1wu90xkKFa8ZDAz9QKPz6tv1zzdZb8=; b=CVJXbFIs8y4O3jiiJk6WuOPXnmlg3ssy9jLURCowsB2vvaTGZYa4C9RbV7/RyUuDwI YPx24+aPwpnnnG+lwohqgtPDmKYq9HSyWfs4uMD6p445XQpNgvUIaL+avXE5YzftZM6I iRnd91uUgOFpYTPITNp8s9riuXJf5ThTdcQHEUMeAGFrB9ZxVIEtEdJjxhGrhVeubwL3 9xkwy+OkgklJvMKyQ+F7uSA3H9zFxSK6eRso4fCD8ClMabmvoWw2aKmeutcW0vLZshow DOU6DlONWIeRrBHmrPKzOM73HTaUumqVqkuC4FTmnXaUmkwUbJDTTrO4SrIztOQHzP5F HP8w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVkcqwgAdGCJktVSIy7e2Xqt/EqHcWmPWD98gVPtBez12d6q3p0 aBgb1+Bc+Ph6uiYpEN/StRg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxr65Sts6pGpIeZ+mEt4drYNX8WsFT2/XMkly9A3jpMv4EJho/hKVuAKBUU/sSwDG8CY6RRCg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f80d:: with SMTP id s13mr22424429wrp.38.1553696440874; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-217-030-068-212.aim-net.cz. [217.30.68.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w21sm206535wmc.4.2019.03.27.07.20.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:20:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:20:40 +0100 To: Adrian Bunk Message-ID: <20190327142040.GB1598@jama> References: <20190325234413.12652-1-ross.burton@intel.com> <20190326102017.GA1929@jama> <20190326104212.GB19885@localhost> <20190327133314.GA1598@jama> <20190327140327.GA21936@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190327140327.GA21936@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] libcomps: put PV in filename X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:20:40 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 122661 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG" Content-Disposition: inline --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:33:14PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:42:12PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >... > > > Not having the release there also loses the ability to use either > > > gcc_%.bbappend or gcc_8.3.0.bbappend, which are suitable for > > > different situations. > >=20 > > There is usually just one version per recipe and even with _git.bb > > suffix you can easily do gcc_7+git.bb and gcc_8+git.bb if you need to. >=20 > Thud contains 8.2 today, but might have 8.3 tomorrow. >=20 > A layer might want to append only to one of them, > or have different appends for different versions. >=20 > That's trivial with gcc_8.2.bb and gcc_8.3.bb, > and harder with gcc_8+svn.bb. If your layer has gcc_8.2.bbappend and the recipe in oe-core gets renamed from gcc_8.2.bb to gcc_8.3.bb in newer thud revision, then your bbappend will not apply and bitbake will complain that there is no recipe for your gcc_8.2.bbappend. Layer which doesn't even parse correctly with different revisions of the same thud branch isn't really something we should encourage. gcc_8%.bbappend with some logic inside (e.g. adding some .patch file only when PV starts with 8.2) will be compatible with both newer and older revision of thud. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQRU+ejDffEzV2Je2oc3VSO3ZXaAHAUCXJuGuAAKCRA3VSO3ZXaA HLIRAJ9uYzsfuLUuVgeff38bcVzvpwxzQQCgj1e3sLbPsR2dv+cOzyIlsExtnC4= =RBDJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG--