From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Respect watchdog cpumask on CPU hotplug
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:16:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327151653.GA23811@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903262245490.1789@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On 03/26, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> The rework of the watchdog core to use cpu_stop_work broke the watchdog
> cpumask on CPU hotplug.
>
> The watchdog_enable/disable() functions are now called unconditionally from
> the hotplug callback, i.e. even on CPUs which are not in the watchdog
> cpumask.
>
> Only invoke them when the plugged CPU is in the watchdog cpumask.
>
> Fixes: 9cf57731b63e ("watchdog/softlockup: Replace "watchdog/%u" threads with cpu_stop_work")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> kernel/watchdog.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -547,13 +547,15 @@ static void softlockup_start_all(void)
>
> int lockup_detector_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - watchdog_enable(cpu);
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &watchdog_allowed_mask))
> + watchdog_enable(cpu);
> return 0;
> }
>
> int lockup_detector_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - watchdog_disable(cpu);
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &watchdog_allowed_mask))
> + watchdog_disable(cpu);
> return 0;
> }
IIUC without this fix an NMI watchdog can too be enabled at boot time even
if the initial watchdog_cpumask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_TIMER) doesn't
include the plugged CPU.
And after that writing 0 to /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog clears
NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED but this can't disable NMI watchdog's outside of
watchdog_allowed_mask.
So may be this can explain the problem reported by Maxime ?
See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b99c5a25-a5fe-18dd-2f1d-bdd6834f03e5@redhat.com/
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-27 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 21:51 [PATCH] watchdog: Respect watchdog cpumask on CPU hotplug Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-27 15:16 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-03-27 19:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-28 9:36 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-03-28 12:37 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190327151653.GA23811@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.